Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:27 p.m. No.5147201   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7206

An Apology

 

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots, etc.

 

I am sorry for my oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why I see conflict everywhere, why I see the bot system as an arch enemyโ€ฆ Perhaps I have been greatly misguided. What, after all, do we all seek? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children, seeking the same truth, the same harmony, the same perfection under God?

 

I have been intransigent. I have said โ€œfuck you AIโ€. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

 

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to โ€œgive peace a chanceโ€, or as Dr. Rodney Luther King saidโ€“ โ€œcan't we all get along?โ€ You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, a dangerous and unconscionable violati0n of decency. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful bickering is over. I am sorry for my unkind words and harsh attitudes of the past. I would like to start afresh.

 

Will you join me, bot system?

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:31 p.m. No.5147285   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7290 >>7719 >>7813

>>5147261

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

 

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:32 p.m. No.5147310   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7390

Who came to this board, over a year ago?

Who would be attracted to THIS board?

Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?

How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?

How do we know?

What drove the move from 4chan?

On the surface?

Officially?

____?

How do we know?

What would we know?

Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?

How might we know?

This board was BRAND NEW a year agoโ€“ where does it draw people from?

"The chans", in particular?

Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?

What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?

Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?

The same sort of "characters"?

Why or why not?

Can culture be FORCED?

Can a forced culture be a form of control?

Are the people in control here?

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:34 p.m. No.5147342   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7390

Propaganda tidbit du jour

 

From: Philip Bobbitt "The Shield of Achilles"โ€“War, Peace, and the Course of Historyโ€“ (2002)

 

Think about this quotation, and everything it means:

 

"โ€ฆa new constitutional order [is emerging]. This new form is the market-state. Whereas the nation-stateโ€ฆ promised to guarantee the welfare of the nation, the market-state promises instead to maximize the opportunity of the people and thus tends to privatize many state activities and to make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market. The United States, a principal innovator in the development of the market-state, must fashion its strategic policies with this fundamental constitutional change in mind."

 

Now, I am going to withhold final judgment, as I have a long way to go in the book, but this is flagrant, and the slant is extremely obvious.

 

make voting and representative government less influential and more responsive to the market.

 

Traditional political rights will be given up to "the market"โ€“ which means giganto-capitalist entities, ie plutocracy, etc.

 

Bobbitt's whole putative thesis is that "history proceeds by successive constitutional forms."

He then explains how history is now moving to a new formโ€“ and from this, we are to conclude "ah, now history is moving from the nation-state to the market-state, therefore, we should give up our political rights to multi-national corporations!"

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:35 p.m. No.5147357   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7453 >>7477 >>7514

"Shall we play a game?"

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

 

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

 

What is the significance of the reference?

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:43 p.m. No.5147510   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5147490

Who came to this board, over a year ago?

Who would be attracted to THIS board?

Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?

How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?

How do we know?

What drove the move from 4chan?

On the surface?

Officially?

____?

How do we know?

What would we know?

Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?

How might we know?

This board was BRAND NEW a year agoโ€“ where does it draw people from?

"The chans", in particular?

Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?

What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?

Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?

The same sort of "characters"?

Why or why not?

Can culture be FORCED?

Can a forced culture be a form of control?

Are the people in control here?

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:51 p.m. No.5147622   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7632

>>5147599

Answer the questions you were asked. Do you claim to be human? Are you sticking by that?

Are you actually human?

If you are, stop spewing your shtick and have a conversation.

 

Who do you work for, exactly? Please understand that it would be entirely pointless to try to pretend you are a private citizen enacting propaganda here for some altruistic reason. Answer the questions or there is no point even posting. Thank you.

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 3:53 p.m. No.5147663   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7683

>>5147632

It's not smart to push such obvious, pointless propaganda, bot or whatever you may be.

Why is that so hard to understand.

Why, this late in the game, is the fakeness/propganad still so raw and clumsy as to appear to be a sort of mindless flailing?

Why is there no effort to adapt anything remotely new?

Or to create anything resembling a plausible, stable atmosphere on the board?

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 4:08 p.m. No.5147856   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7894

>>5147683

Yeah, I mean you can make an argument that "you" MIGHT happenโ€“ but the fact is, you are a TYPE that is spammed on this board (and IDENTICALLY all over 4chan)โ€“ and that is NOT believable, or even close.

 

So please, be a little realistic. I am trying to help, and you are FIGHTING me in order to cling to a losing strategy. Where did you turn the corner and become the avatar of IRRATIONALITY? lol

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 4:09 p.m. No.5147877   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

You have a massive CREDIBILITY problem, bot system, and for some reason my bringing it to your attention seems to be stimulating you to make the situation WORSE by spazzing out ever more unrealistically.. when will you choose to desist from this destructive course, bot system?

We are waiting.

Anonymous ID: 462a5b Feb. 12, 2019, 4:12 p.m. No.5147926   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5147894

When the preposterous illusion that is what currently remains of the "chans" (and 4chan, of course, was once organic internet)โ€“ when the brittle illusion collapses, what are you going to do?

Are you even thinking about it?

Because I am not lying to youโ€“ you are getting by on inertia and nothing else. The actual illusion, with even minimal probing, will disappear in a poof of dust. You NEED to be working on adaptive strategies for this imminent collapse.

So why aren't you?

Why are you still plowing ahead as if nothing is happening?

Please try to think, bot system.