>>5148127

I guess I di'nt see what you're seeing in this indictment.

criminals got pinched… and?

>>5148266

Of the possibilities here, which would be the more stupid action to take - and by whom?

>>5148283

>>5148291

>>5148305

However, without proof no matter if it's true or not, you discredit yourself if you go around speaking to anybody within earshot.

>>5148453

>>5148432

It's kinda funny. No matter how much I distrust those connected to the CIA, current or former, Pieczenik brought me out of the black-pilled nihilism I'd pretty much settled into - well, his video and the subsequent election result. The second corroborated the first and it gave me that spark of a light at the end of the darkness for me to re-engage.

>>5148500

I did not say I disagree with you.

Just a reminder, unless you enjoy being seen as a loon, puttin it out there with no proof isn't the smartest course of action.