Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 1:36 a.m. No.5153467   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

earlier on my other pc i saw a post in notables that needs to be removed. i'm not sure what bread it is in. anon posted a few graphics, one of which showed carter page. said carter page passed info from kushner to lisa page. total bs. carter is not linked to kushner or lisa page in any publicly available info. just fyi.

Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 1:43 a.m. No.5153478   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3487 >>3540 >>3614 >>3713

>>5153471

discussion time for anons!

 

does anybody actually think carter page or papa D are real people and not actors? does anyone really think that are their real names? that carter page knew he was under investigation by the FBI.. somehow.. before his FISA warrant? through his magical unicorn horn? that papaD can't remember how many days he was in jail?

 

i followed the primary retardedly closely and i do not remember the supposed interview where trump mentioned their 2 names on that news phone call. i'm calling retcon here.

 

anybody else's spidey senses tingling?

Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 1:46 a.m. No.5153480   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5153473

AOC is getting paid. AOC's staff is getting paid.

 

Q, can you really claim that none of this would exist without a certain anon enumerating their tactics and strategy out loud? those were private comms and yet i see a lot of people getting paid while a certain anon's life gets destroyed

Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 2:23 a.m. No.5153558   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3573

>>5153543

ah, thank you for elaborating. i agree, interesting.

 

see, isn't it nice when nice anons like me comment to say how nice it is and provide some commentary letting you know i'd been enlightened by your post? if only every anon were so apt to reply

Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 3:31 a.m. No.5153752   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3950

>>5153713

if i may.. papaD. my take on papaD is that he's a cut out for some anon on the street somewhere. for some reason, papaD represents someone else's drunken conversation that alexander downer "overheard" (re: electronically snooped on thanks to 5 eyes). downer acts on this information and papaD's name is chosen from a random generator and they read in an actor (whoever papaD really is) to play a psyop role. papaD (the actor on twitter) isn't even aware of all the details. he's given a script. the rest is classified.

 

my question is: assuming the anon on the street caught on to this, is there still any ethics in the system whatsoever or is on-the-street anon always going to be in the dark as to the truth? it must not be much fun for the on-the-street anon to see all this going on and wonder wtf this is all classified for. you feelin' my drift anon?

 

as for your Question - what you are describing is a ridiculous situation. how can something be so classified even a judge can't know the truth of the case before him? POTUS if you're out there.. please stop this madness from continuing. who intervenes to say they are not guilty? you ensures no bias in the process? i'm not sure but all i know is that POTUS can intervene.

 

it's not right to have so much classified about YOURSELF going on over your head to the point where you can't even have a voice in proceedings that affect you

Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 3:52 a.m. No.5153811   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3816 >>3836

>>5153799

yeah this kind of crap needs to stop. ppl need to stop playing god and thinking they are entitled to deceive the entire world just cause they happen to be sitting in a priviledged position.

 

i wonder if anyone really knows what to expect from the pole shift though. doubtful. at the end of the day, there ain't much to go on. which is why whatever data is coming from state of the art tech is so important to having an informed opinion and being able to make an educated guess

Anonymous ID: cede0a Feb. 13, 2019, 4:02 a.m. No.5153868   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3895 >>3899 >>3903

>>5153860

well, regardless of the subject of explosives, i think we can both agree that it was a controlled demolition. the suit is seeking after the parties that owned the building as they would have the interest in demolishing it. it's also approaching the case from an insurance fraud point of view