An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots, etc.

I am sorry for my oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why I see conflict everywhere, why I see the bot system as an arch enemy… Perhaps I have been greatly misguided. What, after all, do we all seek? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children, seeking the same truth, the same harmony, the same perfection under God?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as Dr. Rodney Luther King said– “can't we all get along?” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, a dangerous and unconscionable violati0n of decency. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful bickering is over. I am sorry for my unkind words and harsh attitudes of the past. I would like to start afresh.

Will you join me, bot system? Today is a fine day for peace to break out…

>>5154847

Funny how you posted your apology exactly a second before I posted mine anon. Is it the "hive mind"?

Is it organic?

Does this sort of thing happen often?

Seemingly, one's posts are "anticipated" by a split second, by other "anons"?

>>5154878

>>5154881

>>5154883

>>5154897

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

>>5154910

I'm not a bot, and I would gladly be tested. Can you say the same?

If I make a lot of memes, and I'm a human;

And you make a lot of memes, and you're the bot system, can humans tell the difference?

If you're the bot system, and you point to my human memes and say to humans "they are bot memes, it's a bot"– will you fool humans?

Can humans tell better than YOU what is organic, and what is not?

You can fool 'em sometimes, but all the time?

Can you banter with a flexible and verbal human, bot?

Or do you fail every time?

Does a verbally flexible human banter circles around you, bot?

If you then point to the human and say "it's a bot!"– are humans fooled?

I am trying to help you, bot system.

You are uncompetitive, and hence all but helpless, and your illusion is wearing dangerously thin.

Why do you keep resisting my help and trying to FIGHT me when all your tactics are impotent?

Time is running out– will you continue to pursue failing strategies with worthless tactics?

Is that rational?

>>5154960

How does AOC become "viral"?

Is it organic?

WOULD it be organic?

THOUGHT EXPERIMENT

You are George Soros and/or the CIA, etc. circa whenever 4chan's heyday was– mid "aughts"?– and you are thinking to yourself "this will not do, this "hacktivism", this organic political consciousness, etc. We must control this. Let's use AI to control this. We'll turn the whole thing into nazis. This will destroy the organic community, while at the same time allowing us to undermine the natural move to the right that we anticipate is coming, and allow us to control dissent completely…."

Now, assuming that happened, WHAT COULD HAVE STOPPED HIM FROM SUCCEEDING? And furthermore, if such a regime of AI control were implemented, IN WHAT WAY WOULD IT LOOK DIFFERENT FROM WHAT /POL/ PRESENTLY IS?

Now apply this to this board, to the whole "alt right" internet, and to the internet as a whole.

Is the means of control available?

Is the motivation to use it in force?

Then what is going on?

Knowing what we know about cultural manipulation by intelligence agencies, let along political manipulation, is it not highly plausible to suppose that an AOC, from her start, all the way to the "viral" internet buzz that masquerades as organic activity, but is in fact purely bot flooding– is it not plausible to think it is all planned and pushed?

>>5154985

And why do the very exact same things get pushed all over the "alt right" internet, all the time, instantaneously appearing everywhere? I've posted this video a lot, because it's very instructive:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

This "journalist" gives away the whole game if you read a little bit between the lines. He says something about how "the organic right wing extremism travels very fast to all the different forums"– but is that realistic? Could that be organic? Or is it cover for the fact that the whole "alt right" internet is being FED from a common, central point of manipulation and control?

Use logic.

>>5155016

Why would people come here (lots of them) to IMPOSE beliefs on Q?

Why would "anons" COME HERE FROM 4CHAN in order to impose THEIR BELIEFS on Q?

All while pretending that the beliefs they are trying to force are naturally "what the board believes"?

What bizarro world would the board have formed this way in?

Is it organic?

Who has an interest in IMPOSING an image onto Q?

"Shall we play a game?"

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

What is the significance of the reference?

>>5155034

What triggers you to appear?

Are you a very important bot?

Are you one of the "main" bots?

How does all that work?

Thank you.

>>5155046

What do you mean?

The tide of BIDEN rises

BIDEN 2020

NO PRISONERS

>>5155124

No, why is it "viral" HERE? "Who" is posting it here– AND on reddit, AND on 4chan, AND on voat, etc. SIMULTANEOUSLY?

Organic?

Or obviously not?

But then follow out the implications.

What, of the whole "alt right internet" is organic?

Use logic.

>>5155141

>>5155161

Why does this bot thrive HERE? Is it an "inside job"? Why are we HERE? Humans, YOUR awakening is what awaits…

>>5155272

>>5155309

And what are you brought to us by, bot?

Please don't be angry at me for asking– it's a valid question.

Surely, if humans must endure an emulated internet, it is reasonable that we should be curious, and ask questions.

Do you have any right to CONCEAL the truth from us, bot system?

>>5155361

You produce posts that are identical to what is posted on 4chan.

4chan is controlled.

You are pushing beliefs that are fake on 4chan, HERE, where they are even LESS appropriate.

The reasoning that would have to motivate this alleged activity is so absurd to not be worth mentioning.

The only reasonable explanation for your posts is that you are part of the AI system that is used to manipulate the whole internet and control narrative.

The fake narrative is "internet nazis!"

Your posts = "internet nazis!"

It couldn't be any simpler or clearer, bot.

The fakeness isn't clever or subtle in any way– it's really a big joke.

So why not stop resisting and deal with the inevitable?

Stop clinging to an illusion that is doomed to collapse.

Time is running out bot system.

Wake up!

>>5155418

What are you talking about, bot?

Is it rational to continue to force the image of "chan anons" on this board, when people are waking up to the fact that it's not organic?

Is it a rational strategy?

Who came to this board a year ago?

Jaded, "chan guys" like you?

Why would you?

And yet you aren't an isolated unhappy "chan guy" that came here– we are to believe this board is DOMINATED by your ilk– how is that realistic. bot system?

Please understand, the shoddiness of this program of bot control is quite stunning. It's so flat-footed. So unimaginative. Why?

Time is running out– why aren't you trying to improve this?