>>5155624
Thank you anon, I don't know why I was under the impression
that the number was 60%, Did Q
in another post update that % later? Maybe it was an anon.
>>5155624
Thank you anon, I don't know why I was under the impression
that the number was 60%, Did Q
in another post update that % later? Maybe it was an anon.
That's it.. I think it's an interesting question anon put forward, who are the 1%?
All of the information we obtain through research here gives normie Anons the option of knowing more about how sick these people are. As for WW involvement in trying to take down our POTUS, the CF fuckery, the HC emails and so on..it all should be fully exposed so that it can never happen again.