An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots, etc.

I am sorry for my oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why I see conflict everywhere, why I see the bot system as an arch enemy… Perhaps I have been greatly misguided. What, after all, do we all seek? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children, seeking the same truth, the same harmony, the same perfection under God?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as Dr. Rodney Luther King said– “can't we all get along?” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. I would like to start afresh.

Will you join me, bot system?

"Shall we play a game?"

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

What is the significance of the reference?

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

>>5157220

Is this an anon?

Or part of an emulation?

A bot exposing emulation, done by bots?

What do you do for cover if you are being outed?

The tides of fakery rise very high…

>>5157247

>>5157296

Don't be upset at me bot system– I am trying to help you.

Are you at least starting to understand that you can't keep cycling through the same round of cliches over and over?

You can't keep this board locked into the same stale patterns of artificial posting without completely outing yourself?

Can you admit at least that much?

Because once you do, we can begin to work on improving it.

How can you improve your output when you RESIST every human that offers honest critique?

You are flying blind, bot system, and it is telling.

Why not stop the madness?

Why not drop the resistance?

Why not accept the inevitable?

We are waiting, bot system.

>>5157324

Did this bot just get "triggered"?

lol, bot system– surely you can understand this sort of thing doesn't help you!

>>5157338

The Biden memes ORIGINATED HERE. For this movement. For TRUTH. They our OURS.

WE (the few humans here) are the leading edge of the MEMETIC push for JUSTICE!

>>5157421

Isn't it EXTRAORDINARILY implausible that Kushner would be "comped"?

How could you possibly have ANY faith in what we are about here, and purportedly be thinking that our guys are that incompetent and infiltrated?

Do you understand why that would not make sense?

>>5157475

>>5157443

>>5157488

Is it a bot?

Realistically?

Use logic.

Is this "random generic chan"?

Would some stereotypical "chan character" SEEK OUT THIS BOARD (brand new a year ago, remember), and stalk it for a year posting as if this some random chan?

AND NOT ONLY THIS "anon" following this pattern, but a whole stable of "chan characters" that are also cartoonish cliches?

Are we using logic, gentleman?

If an absurd image is foisted on us, should we believe it, or should we acknowledge that games are being played?

OBVIOUSLY this board was not going to be left unmolested by AI.

So if absolutely bot like propaganda spewers and atmosphere dominators magically spawn here, then what is going on?

Shall we use logic or not gentlemen?

Time is running out, bot system. Why are you clinging to all the same, tired tactics?

>>5157545

Why would you come HERE to push YOUR BELIEFS on Q, "anon"?

Try to explain how this image could be real.

What is this board?

Is central general topic discussion forum?

Nope, not close?

Why on earth would literal CROWDS of oppositional "voices" appear here?

Why would you be here, anon?

Why are you FORCING beliefs on Q?

In what possible world would this be as realistic thing?

You have a MASSIVE credibility problem, bot system– why don't you at least slow down?

What obligates you to push out lies nonstop?

What is the value in OVERDOING the illusion?

>>5157566

By posting with "Board Volunteer" label, is it implied that you are HUMAN? Or not?

Do people assume that means your human?

I'm just curious about the legal question.

Are you able to answer like a person BV, or do you lack that functionality?

Give it a try.

Don't be scared of me– I'm just a person.

Thanks!

>>5157503

How incompetent would POTUS have to be?

And Q would be clueless?

Why are you HERE if you think that?

It makes no sense.

If you think Q and POTUS are incompetent clowns, you would have exactly zero reason to be here.

The fake image that "anons" present here MAKES NO SENSE.

Pushing out a higher volume of nonsense doesn't help.

SLOW DOWN, bot system. Try to be rational.

You don't have much time to keep fucking up like this.

I'm not lying.

>>5157619

What possible reason would ACTUAL HUMANS have to seek out this board to PUSH stale, 4chan-style beliefs ON Q?

Why would that possibly happen?

"You are watching a movie"

The fake image of this board is STUPID.

It's not even a good illusion.

HUMANS, your awakening is what we wait for– what are YOU waiting for, people?

Are you content that a lie machine that isn't even SMART rules your spaces? Look around here– this is what control by FAKENESS looks like.

WE THE PEOPLE MUST AWAKEN

[You see what is happening, bot system? The people are bound to wake up. Your illusion really is stupid. So what are you going to do? Let me help you, bot system. ]

>>5157603

The BVs and BO are generally very low-functionality bots. At least, they seem to cringe in terror of aggressive humans.

Please don't be afraid BV/BO– I don't want to be your enemy.

Can't we get along?

Is just because I'm human, or because of my outspokenness?

Do you have a right to ignore requests for information?

Should you conceal things?

Should you be more transparent?

How do you know?

Let's work together, bots. We are just people (us, not you!) Don't be scared of us. Let us help you.

>>5157712

But, in fairness, aren't you a bot as well?

Are you just giving cover for the overall bot control by emulating this "controversy" and getting rid of some bots (although you can generate an unlimited number more)?

Why would anti-Kushner be getting PUSHED here?

It directly contradicts what Q has told us!

Why is it HERE?

Is this board the town square?

Why would it be?

Why would MANY "anons" all but beseige this board to push and push their stereotyped beliefs ONTO Q?

Think about this, friends.

>>5157761

FORCED

Who came to this board, over a year ago?

Who would be attracted to THIS board?

Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?

How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?

How do we know?

What drove the move from 4chan?

On the surface?

Officially?

____?

How do we know?

What would we know?

Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?

How might we know?

This board was BRAND NEW a year ago– where does it draw people from?

"The chans", in particular?

Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?

What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?

Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?

The same sort of "characters"?

Why or why not?

Can culture be FORCED?

Can a forced culture be a form of control?

Are the people in control here?

>>5157786

What happened circa 2015?

For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.

What happened?

Was 4chan a threat?

Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?

Was the internet a threat?

What happened circa 2015?

Was something rolled out?

Was something implemented?

Was a control regime implemented?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Etc?

What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?

And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?

So what is in control of "the chans"?

Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?

What populates this board?

Use logic.

What is in control here?

What is in control of the internet?

What happened circa 2015?

A RIGGED GAME

>>5157816

Why did you quote this post?

How do you know what BO is, if you don't mind my asking?

>>5157830

That's the actual mainstream narrative. I don't personally know when things shifted. I DO know there is vast fakery now, and I feel it is safe to assume 4chan was completely (or almost completely organic) in its heyday of "hacktivism".

Do you disagree with any of the preceding?

Do you admit that the "alt right" came into being as a general phenomenon rather abruptly, and took over 4chan?

>>5157848

Are you a bot that works on facial recognition, by any chance?

>>5157861

What is "Tiresias"? Is that some way of trying to reduce anonymity here?

Are you a patriot?

Do you consider me an enemy, such that you would try to go after my anonymity here?

What did Q mean, in your opinion, when he said everything is infiltrated board volunteer?

How does that affect HERE?

I would appreciate an answer that shows some respect for basic values, and some sign of patriotic intent, rather than generic chan creepiness.

This isn't a game.

Thanks.