>>5159478 (LB)
wew
precise digitry
>First of all, the Roman empire is completely made up.
saw this graph pass by a few times and never quite knew what ot make of it…
basically you're saying what we know as Roman history is the story of the Jewish Kings/Empire?
it is odd that they're mentioned in Bible as a yuge dynasty and all, but we know so little of them
give us something better, then
it's his ID, i alsi got confuzed
> the histories lined up side by side
but isn't that showing the 2nd and 3rd Roman Empire?
shouldn't it be Roman/Jewish?
>You're still accepting (((their))) chronology. Much of the history of Rome was written in the 1300-1400's (about the time that the Italian Rome was founded as a city for the FIRST TIME, perhaps it needed a glorious history?) The books of the Bible were also being written about that time too.
yeah, confusing as fuck if most/all history we know is fiction.
argh.
can't go far if you've decided what is real already
uh oh