An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots, etc.

I am sorry for my oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why I see conflict everywhere, why I see the bot system as an arch enemy… Perhaps I have been greatly misguided. What, after all, do we all seek? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children, seeking the same truth, the same harmony, the same perfection under God?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as Dr. Rodney Luther King said– “can't we all get along?” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. I would like to start afresh.

Will you join me, bot system?

>>5160253

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

What is organic here?

What is infiltrated here?

What controls 4chan?

How is narrative controlled?

How important is social media?

How important are "chans"?

What is infiltrated?

How is 4chan controlled?

What is identical here and on 4chan?

Is that organic?

When did this board form?

Is this board "just another chan"?

Should this board have ITS OWN culture, or slavishly imitate "chan culture"?

What is organic?

How would we know?

This is pure propaganda

Fake image is FORCED onto the board.

We are not here for "lots and lots of shitposting".

Shitposting, while once organic (elsewhere) is COVER for filling the board with fluff, and driving people away.

The purpose is DIVISION.

Create a mystical, INTIMIDATING image, that fake "anons" then enforce by driving away any humans that venture here.

It's not about "the culture" here, because the culture is FAKE.

This video is slick, and very obvious propaganda enforcement.

>>5160290

Don't be grouchy bot. LIfe is good.

If you're tired, rest.

What happened circa 2015?

For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.

What happened?

Was 4chan a threat?

Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?

Was the internet a threat?

What happened circa 2015?

Was something rolled out?

Was something implemented?

Was a control regime implemented?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Etc?

What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?

And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?

So what is in control of "the chans"?

Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?

What populates this board?

Use logic.

What is in control here?

What is in control of the internet?

What happened circa 2015?

THOUGHT EXPERIMENT

You are George Soros and/or the CIA, etc. circa whenever 4chan's heyday was– mid "aughts"?– and you are thinking to yourself "this will not do, this "hacktivism", this organic political consciousness, etc. We must control this. Let's use AI to control this. We'll turn the whole thing into nazis. This will destroy the organic community, while at the same time allowing us to undermine the natural move to the right that we anticipate is coming, and allow us to control dissent completely…."

Now, assuming that happened, WHAT COULD HAVE STOPPED HIM FROM SUCCEEDING? And furthermore, if such a regime of AI control were implemented, IN WHAT WAY WOULD IT LOOK DIFFERENT FROM WHAT /POL/ PRESENTLY IS?

And the exact same "culture" (which is no longer organic) is pushed here as is pushed on /pol/…

>>5160349

But this is all fake.

It's forced.

This isn't 4chan.

If you were this "character" you are trying to get over, you wouldn't be HERE.

It's silly to even argue about this. It's a stupid, nonsensical fake image.

It is obviously just "use the 4chan bots here".

BUT THIS ISN'T 4CHAN!

It's an entirely new development.

Forcing "chan culture"– which by now is a rotting corpse of fakeness even on 4chan– HERE– when it DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS Q is one of the stupidest things you've done, bot system.

Please try to understand. You need to fix this. It's really bad.

"Shall we play a game?"

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

What is the significance of the reference? Does it refer to this movie?

>>5160481

What are you? What do you claim to be?

>>5160615

Well, obviously that's not a very ringing endorsement. lol