Anonymous ID: 51506a Feb. 27, 2018, 9:54 p.m. No.516520   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6540 >>6544 >>6603

>>516441

 

Eric Dollard is the greatest living expert on electricity, the man haled as the next Tesla by those with enough intellectual capacity to understand him, and the only man alive to have replicated multiple Tesla experiments and demonstrations.

 

In return for that he has been attacked by multiple groups, had his lab stolen and destroyed several times and in general been hounded for doing research into things that the deep state would rather not see researched.

 

That is the man you're calling a lunatic.

 

Your statement demonstrates you don't have the intellectual horsepower to keep up, you're a shill, or both.

Anonymous ID: 51506a Feb. 27, 2018, 10:06 p.m. No.516599   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6665 >>6774

>>516540

Notice how divisionfags all scream "SHILL" but don't post any sauce?

 

Propaganda is what you are engaged in.

 

Of course, you can always post some sauce to verify your claims, but you haven't.

 

Hell, even Hussein Obama claims his administration was scandal free and Hillary, Holder, Rice, Lynch and Comey all back him up on that. Look at their pretty credentials!! Look how many idiots believe them instead of the truth.

 

But you? We're still waiting on the sauce.

Anonymous ID: 51506a Feb. 27, 2018, 10:15 p.m. No.516654   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6676 >>6685

>>516574

How many times has Eric Dollard had his lab equipment and personal property illegally seized or destroyed by people who don't want him doing research? It's happened at least 3 times and anyone on this board would automatically understand that means he was on to something.

 

Of course, you may not be able to understand it, but it's OK. Only a very small percentage of people have that kind of intellect.

Anonymous ID: 51506a Feb. 27, 2018, 10:36 p.m. No.516774   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6807

>>516698

Look at the two responses to your question. What this is about is from these two posts and I'm the anon who wrote them:

 

>>515502

>>515507

 

Notice that I said nothing in those posts about not being able to bounce RF off satellites, I was talking about RF signals originating from satellites. What c4fbb7 wrote in the post you responded to has nothing to do with those posts because I was talking about the very basic principle of a carrier wave and a signal wave and the resulting upper and lower sidebands. Really basic RF stuff.

 

c4fbb7 says I'll spend hours defending what I wrote, claiming he doesn't know what he is talking about.

 

When called out, >>516599 and asked to provide sauce to prove he's right, c4fbb7 claims this entire board are retards and he won't do it.

 

You decide who the shill is.

Anonymous ID: 51506a Feb. 27, 2018, 11:15 p.m. No.517001   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7022

>>516876

>probably understand it as well as most

 

Which means you understand just about nothing.

 

I asked you if you understood how radio is transmitted and how audio is transmitted over radio frequency. Those were specific questions to get an idea of what you wanted to know.

 

Then you say:

 

>radio waves do not mix in free space.

 

Do you not understand what a radio transmitter is and what it does? The transmitter combines the carrier wave with the signal (audio or data) wave and these signals are broadcast from the antenna. The type of antenna determines how a signal is broadcast.

 

Your questions are like asking me what the effect of scalar waves is when they intersect. The problem is, scalar isn't a waveform.

 

Electron speed (v) = (2eV/m)1/2