Draining the Swamp: A theory on the Virginia Gov.,Lt. Gov., and AG scandals and the impending removal from the United States of America all who swear allegiance to a foreign state
I have a theory as to what is meant by draining the swamp, relying on hidden and once-thought-destroyed history, and how the political scandals cascading throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia are the point in which the hidden war to Drain the Swamp is finally being revealed to the public.
(1/14)
Our Founding Fathers deemed it necessary to prevent foreign influence in American government, and in doing so included the Titles of Nobility and Emoluments clause in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution.
Funny how there is a huge push to get Trump impeached on the Emoluments Clause. Anyone who has been following Q for any length of time knows that anything they try to pin on Trump (projection), they themselves are guilty of. However, when this one backfires on them, it will reverberate throughout history for a thousand years.
(2/14)
One such element of the aforementioned Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 in the Constitution is regarding Titles of Nobility. In 1810, in the time of the Napoleonic Wars, there was concern in the US regarding the son of Jerome Bonaparte (Jerome being Napoleon's brother) holding US citizenship through his american mother, and the possibility of him exercising foreign influence in the US. In response, then republican senator Philip Reed of Maryland introduced a bill to strengthen the Titles of Nobility act.
(3/14)
However, hindsight would prove the Payseurs a much more devious adversary necessitating the Titles of Nobility bill. The head, Daniel Payseur, AKA Crown Prince Louis, AKA Louis XVII of France, the son of Queen Marie Antoinette. A family of extreme wealth, owning hundreds of corporations, many of which are of fortune 500 and the largest in the world. Their family wealth is managed by GAALT, founded in 1620, and has a monopoly on all telecommunications. The forerunner to the CIA, the Office of Strategic Services, was created from the Payseur's own security network, formed by the Selma, Rome and Dalton Railroad to protect the military railroad system. The secret royal bloodline of Payseurs own everything, see everthing, and control everything.
One might entertain the thought that the Payseurs, then, have a vested interest in preventing the ratification of the Titles of Nobility amendment. History would seem to show their wish was granted.
(4/14)
The War of 1812 commenced in June of that year, and by that time, 11 of 13 required states had ratified the Titles of Nobility amendment, with four rejecting it. By December, one more would ratify.
To British historians, the War of 1812 is considered a minor theater of the Napoleonic wars. Kind of makes sense, doesn't it, if one might consider that the british were fighting the french on US soil. Imagine if stopping the ratification of the Titles of Nobility was an intentional coincidence of the War of 1812. In war, buildings tend to burn, proceedings tend to be halted, and records tend to disappear.
(5/14)
Now it might wishful thinking to conclude that the Payseurs may have had something to do with the cloud of uncertainty as to whether Virginia has ratified the Titles of Nobility amendment. But what if Virginia, being originally charted as the Colony of Virginia by the joint-stock Virginia Company of Plymouth in 1606 and settled in 1607. Could not the joint-stock Virginia Company continue to this day in one shape or another? What if the Payseurs eventually gained control of it? And if so, what company owner would let their underlings enact a policy that would effectively terminate his own employment and benefits? GAALT was founded in 1620 during the years of the Virginia Company of Plymouth.
(6/14)
A cursory glance at any constitutional reference would show that indeed there is no Titles of Nobility 13th amendment to the constitution, and that the actual 13th amendment as we know it, abolition of slavery and involuntary servitude, was ratified and adopted in 1865. More on that later.
In 1991, David Dodge published an article titled "The Missing 13th Amendment" in the August issue of AntiShyster, claiming to have found proof that the Titles of Nobility amendment was actually ratified by Virginia on March 12th, 1819.
Being that Esquire is a Title of Nobility and any attorney would lose citizenship under the amendment, it should be no surprise that an attorney would likewise pen a counter-argument. In 1999, Jol A. Silversmith would author a rebuttal titled "The Missing Thirteenth Amendment: Constitutional Nonsense and Titles of Nobility" for a law journal.
(7/14)
the image included details the outright nitpicking between David Dodge and and Senator Mitchell in a series of letters in 1991 regarding ratification of the TONA amendment.
The communication between Dodge and Mitchell went something like this, in a nutshell:
Senator Mitchell: It was a publishing error. Dodge: many publications were found.
OK, so it wasn't a publishing error, but only 12 out of 13 states ratified it.
OK, so Virginia was actually the 13th state to ratify it, but three-fourths of votes were not received within the time frame needed.
OK, so there wasn't a time limit for ratification, but in 1819 there were 21 states in the union so 16 states would need to ratify.
OK, so only 13 states actually needed to ratify, but the US Secretary of State never recieved a 'Certificate of Ratification' from Virginia
That's it. The only remaining argument against ratification of the TONA 13th amendment is that the US Secretary of State didn't recieve a "certificate of ratification." Yet other states have ratified in various other ways over the years that were officially accepted and did not include a Certificate of Ratification.
(8/14)
Here are the official documents showing Virginia did in fact ratify the Titles of Nobility amendment.
On March 12th, 1819 Virginia passed an act for the re-publication of the laws of the Commonwealth, of which the very first is the constitution of the United States, and the amendments thereto, in the 'ACTS Passed at a GENERAL ASSEMBLY of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 1819".
Likewise, the "amendments thereto", including the Titles of Nobility 13th amendment, is officially published on page 50 of 'The Revised Code of the Laws of Virginia, vol 1, 1819'.
Then, to satisfy the the requirement to notify the federal government, Virginia passed an act requiring their governor to transmit said re-published laws with the ratified TONA amendment to the US State Department.
(9/14)
Here is a collection of many states and territories official law books showing that the Titles of Nobility amendment is the 13th amendment, from 1818 all the way up to 1876.
part 1
(10a/14)
Here is a collection of many states and territories official law books showing that the Titles of Nobility amendment is the 13th amendment, from 1818 all the way up to 1876.
part 2
(10b/14)
Here is a collection of many states and territories official law books showing that the Titles of Nobility amendment is the 13th amendment, from 1818 all the way up to 1876.
part 3
(10c/14)