>>5165686

Proverbs 26:5

>>5165711

Luke 23:3

Then Pilate asked Him, saying, “Are You the King of the Jews?”

Jesus answered him and said, “It is as you say.”

>>5165739

Revelation 19:11

>>5165730

>>5165748

Messiah and King are two different words in greek and hebrew.

Mashiach (Messiah) and Melek (king) and Chrestos (anointed One) all different words, with different meanings.

RECONCILE

>>5165795

>Titus 1:10-11

>>5165811

Jude 1:9

>>5165808

That still doesn't support your assertion that "King" (Caesar) meant "Messiah" (Chrestos) when Pilate said it.

In fact, there is no biblical, historical, or linguistic support for your random comment "That meant Messiah back then."

I agree that many Jews would have seized Jesus, and forcibly made Him their King, (because the Bible tells me so,) but your comment was not true, according to any translation, (or even the context.)

>>5165920

Nope. You said something provably incorrect, and now you wish it made sense.

It doesn't. Jesus acknowledged that He was the rightful King of the Jews, and somehow, the clear text of Scripture bothered you, so you had to say it meant something else (other than what it obviously said.)

Not sure why—

But, whatever.