>>5165730

No. He said, "It is you who say it."

>>5165730

Pilatus autem interrogavit eum dicens tu es rex Iudaeorum at ille respondens ait tu dicis

Pilate then questioned him saying, "Are you the king of the Jews? And that man (Jesus) in response said, "You [emphasis on you] say it."

>>5166129

KEK. Yeah, hardly anybody marries a traitor.

T-20

>>5166258

You are saying it is translated into the Latin incorrectly. Is that what you are saying?

>>5166294

What language was it originally written in?

>>5166321

Show us how it was translated incorrectly into the Latin from the Greek.

>>5166328

Yes, but the original Arimaic is not extant.

>>5166330

I can translate ancient Greek and Latin. Can you present the Greek version of Luke 23:3?

>>5166348

I know. I am just giving you enough rope to hang yourself.

>>5166353

But you claim that it was translated into the Latin incorrectly from the Greek. Show us the proof. You obviously can read ancient Greek and Latin, so it shouldn't be too hard.

>>5166366

Let me guess. You have a Doctorate from Kalamazoo Technical Community College.

>>5166373

That's exactly what it says in Latin:

"It is you who is saying it."

>>5166386

Quite the opposite.

>>5166389

It translates exactly the same from both Greek and Latin: "You say it" (with emphsis on 'you')

su legeis = YOU say it.

tu dicis= YOU say it.

>>5166394

They did in your case - to get rid of you.