>>517235

Alex, "What is a transducer/filter"

What if the ELF signal "magically" comes out as sound below the audible threshhold as a result?

>>517261

>>517261

You are incorrect in what you think I'm implying. Read for comprehension.

>All in all I think the post is BS

Yes, it's Basic Science, in a nutshell.

>It is known that ELF radio waves can have effects on the human nervous system

It is well known and well studied, both in animals and in humans. Much of the study is now and has been criminal in nature.

>It is unknown if any such devices are in use

Which is why Q tasked us to learn the truth. It's out there as public source, we just have to dig it out.

>Many of the patents are hypothetical in nature with no actual working models or demonstrations

Have you ever heard of this thing called an MRI? Do you understand what it can measure, test and explore?

Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) (11–14) provides an

invaluable, noninvasive imaging technique to map long-range,

brain-wide functional connectivity networks based on the temporal

coherence of infraslow (0.005–0.1 Hz) blood oxygen level dependent

(BOLD) activity.

http:// www.pnas.org/content/pnas/114/33/E6972.full.pdf Read it. You might learn something.

Keep in mind that we're supposed to be looking for something that resulted from a discovery that caused some 26 individuals being murdered in order to cover up the discovery.

However, keep attacking the digging that I and other anons are doing. All it does is convince us that we're getting closer because otherwise you concernfags wouldn't even respond to it. We're talking about mind control and Q flat out said it was possible to do it with a cell phone.

>>517423

Your make an argument by pointing to verifiable facts, it's called "making an argument". The conflict of two arguments is called a debate. All I've seen from you is "this is BS" shitposting.

Where's your sauce? No sauce, no argument, no debate.

And… you obviously didn't read the linked article on the MRI.

>>517443

You stated facts of physics, eh? Let's see. From this bread under the ID of 198271.

>The problem I see is that transmitting an ELF signal from above the ionosphere and expecting it to reach the surface is a bit far fetched.

And yet, we have satellite communication with submerged submarines using ELF signals, so perhaps they're loving your ideas of "far fetched".

>the author seemed to be implying the sum and difference signals were transmitted separately and as such would need two very different antennas to operate efficiently.

Again, read for comprehension.

If you have a carrier wave and signal wave that are very close in frequency you get an upper sideband that's almost double the frequency of the carrier wave and the lower sideband of only a small fraction of the carrier wave's frequency. All out of the same antenna.

>All in all I think the post is BS

>agreed smells like pseud-science propaganda

Those appear to be your "stated facts of physics" as they appeared in this bread. Obviously you believe your opinions are facts of physics.

And, no, I wasn't trying to tell you anything with the article, the point was what the MRI was showing in terms of how the brain responded to ELF signals. The MRI is a diagnostic tool.

The studies demonstrate the testing of ELF signals on the human brain, using the MRI so they can determine the specific responses. That should scare the shit out of you. Once it is known what the specific frequencies, modulations, pulses and amplitudes might be needed to cause a specific effect, all it takes is a calibrated device to produce what is needed.

As Q would say, expand your thinking.

>>517535

>the only ELF to submarine transmissions I'm aware of…

And we're all aware of that your awareness is a state of unawareness. And we're all still waiting for your "stated facts of physics" but at this point nobody is holding their breath…

Shill, you really should have read that thesis from the Naval Graduate School.

>>517565

The only thing you've proved in this bread is that you provide no evidence other than your opinions, which is the evidence you brought a knife to a gunfight.

>>517584

I'd say that the efficiency of a 20 kilometer antenna, properly arranged and tuned, would do a fine job from space, broadcasting at 20Kw. Which was what the Naval Graduate School thesis I linked to outlined back in 1988, some 30 years ago.

And we do in fact have satellite communication with submerged submarines, as a simple google search will attest to.

The ELF can't get through the ionosphere without a HF carrier wave. The HF signal gets filtered out in the water but the ELF doesn't.

You've now proven beyond any reasonable doubt you truly are an idiot. You need to go back to kikebook.

>>517593

Not a waste, it's good for the other anons to see shills like this get spanked.

>>517603

The anon you're responding to is a shill.

I suggest you sit down and watch the history of electricity vid by Eric Dollard. When you get done, get specific for any other questions you might have, there are dozens of vids by him on the tube.

A bunch of his books are available on the net and he just came out with two books on Versor algebra so you can do the math without Maxwells equations or calculus.

>>517633

I've been collecting these posts in the separate thread on the shooter and therapy question. If you see anything that you think belongs there, please copy them over. I linked dozens and dozens of posts.

I'm convinced that this started with Marconi and the 3 scientists Q mentions were among the 26 who died that worked at Marconi or were associated with Marconi, almost all between 1986 and 1988. Whatever they discovered got sanitized.

The real question Q asked was what recent shooters had received treatment in the past. That is a question that the shills are working overtime to distract everyone from. It was Q's most recent mission for us.

He posted either 8 or 9 times on this subject on the 15th and it's all wrapped around MKULTRA mind control, breaking the mind into a functional/programmable device, cell phones and the 3 dead scientists who found whatever is making it possible to do this today.

>>517629

Anon, please stick around. We need more like you.

To answer your question, I think Eric Dollard is as close as you can get to someone with a consistent theory that links these phenomena together. I'm trying to wrap my head around his versor algebra books right now.