>>5174001 LB
in pic1, you use what Q replied to as part of it
Yes, it is often the timestamp of the posts that Q responds to that is relevant (as opposed to the content).
in pic2, you use the timestamp of a CommieNewsNetwwork article as part of it
Yes, feel free to ignore if if you prefer. Just highlighting the "coincidences".
you interchange seconds and minutes in all of them
That is how it works. Dates, hours, minutes, seconds, post numbers all can migrate places.
pic3 is just retarded
No it is just too complicated for you. Q uses :15 and :10 deltas for comms.
in pic4, 2317 is 2318
That was changed after the fact. Was a valid proof when it was developed. An Anon website changed the numbers after all the 53-47 analysis was already done. That is what screwed up the comms.
I noticed QMap today posted an Anon post as a Q post. I realize this was Q posting (probably calculating the lag in time stamps with posted pictures) but think it throws off the post numbers.
Q has posted Anonymously many times. Don't think those posts should be included in the Qmap sites.