What is this video?
Patriots?
Or is this something being used to push a narrative on top of patriots?
Did "chan culture" create Q?
That is the narrative, and that is what this video reinforces, strongly.
BEWARE. BE VERY WARE
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283
Q Hate Thread Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727
This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!
So how does this work guys?
"4chan hates Q".
Q got run off 4chan.
AND YET.
Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?
So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!
Is ANY of that believably organic?
Is 4chan controlled?
But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?
Everything is infiltrated
Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?
THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?
Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?
I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.
EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.
How could this be?
Who came to this board, over a year ago?
Who would be attracted to THIS board?
Did anons LEAVE 4chan, come here, and make imitation 4chan HERE?
How many bots were active on 4chan when Q appeared?
How do we know?
What drove the move from 4chan?
On the surface?
Officially?
____?
How do we know?
What would we know?
Is the CULTURE of this board organic, or is it FORCED?
How might we know?
This board was BRAND NEW a year ago– where does it draw people from?
"The chans", in particular?
Or more from the millions of patriotic Americans that have heard of Q?
What is more likely to DOMINATE this board?
Should this board have an IDENTICAL "crowd" to what 4chan /pol/ has?
The same sort of "characters"?
Why or why not?
Can culture be FORCED?
Can a forced culture be a form of control?
Are the people in control here?
The PUSH to get people accepting GOOGLE DEEP DREAMED AI memes is intensifying.
Just look.
What does it mean?
The bots REALLY want people to accept these memes.
Is it SYMBOLISM?
A gesture of "ownership"?
Is human passivity the goal, in order to "claim" our free will?
There is lots and lots of this sort of thing, IMO. SUBTLE undermining through co-optation, driving MSM narratives and keeping anything organic from sprouting…
What gets you censored by the "board owner" here?
Do people pay attention?
Is it said to be a "free speech board"?
Is it really?
BO admits to censoring some people.
Why does he censor?
What does he censor?
If someone wrote quality content and tried to make a thread, would it get censored?
Is only "chan style" content allowed?
How do you know?
Look what gets censored. These were all written by an anon FOR HERE, and got censored– why?