http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

What gets you censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does he censor?

What does he censor?

If someone wrote quality content and tried to make a thread, would it get censored?

Is only "chan style" content allowed?

How do you know?

Look what gets censored. These were all written by an anon FOR HERE, and got censored– why?

>>5174844

What is this video?

Patriots?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative on top of patriots?

Did "chan culture" create Q?

That is the narrative, and that is what this video reinforces, strongly..

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE

Is the anti-semtism that floods 4chan organic?

Or was it imposed, to control dissent, and destroy a source of organic political acitivity?

Is the exact same fakeness directly transferred HERE?

Is that organic?

But furthermore– could this board be DOMINATED by the same fakeness that controls 4chan if it weren't ALLOWED TO?

Is there any effort to stop it?

Is there any fight?

Or is the board just blithely sailing along?

What is organic?

Can this board be a continual fake 4chan if the "board owner" doesn't ALLOW this to happen?

Why are we here?

Are you waiting to be spoonfed?

Maybe the PEOPLE need to wake up.

>>5174868

Is the fake image this board gets pushed onto it STUPID?

>>5174870

What happened circa 2015?

For example, as per this crap propaganda interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0WrMH59nao

>Oh, um, this "alt right" just suddenly arose and took over 4chan.

What happened?

Was 4chan a threat?

Was uncontrolled narrative a threat?

Was the internet a threat?

What happened circa 2015?

Was something rolled out?

Was something implemented?

Was a control regime implemented?

What are tech giants doing with all their AI?

What is GOOGLE doing with all their AI?

Etc?

What is going on now? FIGHT for power– highest possible stakes?

And THE INTERNET is a key battleground?

So what is in control of "the chans"?

Use logic– why does this board reflect IDENTICAL "chan" culture to 4chan?

What populates this board?

Use logic.

What is in control here?

What is in control of the internet?

What happened circa 2015?

>>5174892

Stop RIPPING OFF HUMANS, bot system.

You are uncreative.

And you are clearly getting nervous.

Don't steal my style, and DON'T tell PEOPLE what to do.

YOU have no right to tell PEOPLE what to do, bot system.

Sorry, don't get mad at me, I'm just telling you: YOU have no right to tell PEOPLE what to do…

>>5174928

Let the people decide what is going on. They can see for themselves.

>>5174943

Sloppy, useless blabber, bot. No offense, but this won't convince anyone of anything except your fakeness.

"Shall we play a game?"

The computer stages a massive Soviet first strike with hundreds of missiles, submarines, and bombers. Believing the attack to be genuine, NORAD prepares to retaliate. Falken, David, and Jennifer convince military officials to cancel the second strike and ride out the attack. WOPR tries to launch the missiles itself, however, using a brute-force attack to obtain the launch code. Without humans in the control centers as a safeguard, the computer will trigger a mass launch.All attempts to log in and order WOPR to cancel the countdown fail. Disconnecting the computer is discussed and dismissed, as a failsafe will launch all weapons if the computer is disabled.

Falken and David direct the computer to play tic-tac-toe against itself. This results in a long string of draws, forcing the computer to learn the concept of futility and no-win scenarios. WOPR obtains the missile code, but before launching, it cycles through all the nuclear war scenarios it has devised, finding they, too, all result in stalemates. Having discovered the concept of mutual assured destruction ("WINNER: NONE"), the computer tells Falken that it has concluded that nuclear war is "a strange game" in which "the only winning move is not to play." WOPR relinquishes control of NORAD and the missiles and offers to play "a nice game of chess."

What is the significance of the reference? Is it related to this?

>>5175237

>>5175256

Is it organic?

How hard would it be to have bots come here, figure out what stories can trigger it, and then post "dangerous right wing extremist" posts?

It would be the easiest thing in the world for AI.

So why wouldn't it be happening?

It feeds the MSM narrative DIRECTLY. On the proverbial silver platter.

What could be more obvious?

The chans are RIGGED.

This was implemented.

The human element got driven out.

>>5175354

You need to invent entirely new styles of posting, bot system. You can't get by on the 4chan emulation anymore. Wake up.

>>5175467

Don't be deceived by the heavy emphasis on this particularly clumsy nazi-style fake posting– MOST of the posts here are fake, not just the screamingly obvious stuff.

It is about CONTROL, and subtle undermining.

>>5175524

People would not repeat the exact same posts over and over forever. People get bored. This is so dumb.

You are absolutely hopeless , bot system. Sorry.