>>518006
Look at the letter Q
The circle is a clock face.
The line intersecting the circle represents a value on the clock face.
Is the line a starting point?
Congrats to whoever got us working again
Please read this!
I read last night. Although much of it is beyond me at the moment we need to follow this lead so we can properly identify how to unlock the relationship between past posts and future actions.
Trump is a magician.
He misdirects the public with the visible hand while his other hand is busy with the work at hand.
She had an earlier, similar post but she changed the words in this post. There were four (4) I's in the original. I think she is covering her tracks by changing the original message.
Even if this theory is not exactly correct it should be added so that it might be confirmed or refuted. Often a disproved theory leads to new ways of thinking. Nice idea anon
The disruption they cause will make the public more awake.
They are losing it but they have no choice.
NO DEALS
Several anons believe they have found a mathematical formula (See Wikipedia: Modular_Arithmetic) that shows the dates of past Q posts have a correspondence to action that have occurred and will be occurring.
There is circumstantial evidence this theory may hold in the form of POTUS commenting on the MAP after the anons shared their theory.
We are all not mathfag anons but a conceptual anon might help the mathfag anons locate the answer.
That is exactly what the anons that found the correlation have said is occurring. Past Q fragments in posts are playing out in the corresponding future.
I agree that the formula being currently tested appears to have flaws but I think the correspondences between past posts and future action suggests that they are on the right track.
I cannot explain why but I think the solution lies in an elliptical, rather than a linear, shape. Intuition.
Back on point, your experience in structural integrity and its use as a metaphor for how the mathfag anons might test their proofs is excellent and should be added to the conversation.