No. Roberts has been a firm cabal vote. RGB dead leaves a deadlocked SC, 4-4, until RGB's replacement is confirmed by the Senate.
Now, if you left that detail out…then yes. It will prolly move faster than that, though.
US Pres does not have line item veto power. SCt ruled that in Clinton v. City of New York, back in 1998
You fucker are the one not paying attention.
THERE IS NO LINE ITEM VETO, per UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE CLINTON V. CITY OF NEW YORK, 524 U.S. 417 (1998).
Yes. The rule of law isn't suspended. The S Ct will give great deference to the Pres, and in the past (Japanese internment camps) has allowed acts which would probably not be allowed today.
But the rule of law is the rule of law.
Because Clinton wanted line-item veto to gut Rep bills. This was back in the Gingrich "Contract with America" days.
Gotta have a case before them on that issue. And they don't.
S Ct doesn't just rule on stuff it wants to rule on, there MUST be a case in controversy. That is an absolute requirement.
Fully awake. Not happy about things in this country at all.
And no, I'm not going to take up arms until it's time to do so.
I've been to war before - REAL war, not this behind-the-scenes memes and schemes shit.
You do not want real war. We're not at that point yet. When we get there, I'll be happy to tell you.
You're welcome, and me too. Glad to know there's folks like you who are worth fighting for, and who have the backs of those doing it (although if we ever get to that point I'm sure it'll be more like shoulder-to-shoulder with ya.)