>>5180904

TY Baker!!!

SCOTUS Secured for National Emergency. Noel Francisco will see to it:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/371

https://lawreader.com/?p=12762#DESIGNATION

>>5181080

Juan got drafted.

Juan got NPR job.

Juan got canned.

Fox picked up canned asset.

Juan plays a part on Fox (libtard actor).

Juan is MAGA.

>>5181108

Reminds me of:

>>5181446

This.

>>5181506

Long/Short?

I can tell you a name.

I can tell you a play.

I can tell you an "event".

Now, here is where it gets fuzzy.

If I tell you a combination of 2/3, it's a violation.

If I can tell you a combination of 2/3, it might be "OK" if you have a need to know, or it might just be "Breaking News"; under certain statues, it could be considered "Espionage". (remind you of anyone (Hi Julian; how's the vegan diet treatin ya?) ?).

If I tell you all 3, it's a matter of national security. That's a fucking problem.

>>5181599

If only we could get Taco Bell to sponsor.

>Head for the border!

<OK!

>>5181628

See beyond the bill. AFTER HE SIGNS IT, the declaration will go straight to SCOTUS as per Solicitor General. Then, we got the play because SCOTUS is secured:

>>5180439 (lb)

>>5180439 (lb)

>>5181688

It's the most dramatic, though.

>>5181701

Simple explanation: Libertarianism.

Complex explanation: Movie script.

Plausible explanation: Inferiority complex in conjunction with father legacy complex.