Anonymous ID: 85b2db Feb. 14, 2019, 7:55 p.m. No.5181499   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1580

>>5181481

Then I just do not understand why he retweeted the WhiteHouse that he would sign it.

Are we supposed to read something into "the Government Funding Bill" since it does not state particularly WHICH government funding bill or WHEN he would sign it?

Anonymous ID: 85b2db Feb. 14, 2019, 8:01 p.m. No.5181586   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1671 >>1709

>>5181532

That's what concerns me.

My dilemma is that POTUS is a principled man of his word, and he retweeted this which originated from Sarah Sanders 7 hours ago:

From the summaries we've seen so far, it looks like the bill attempts to tie his hands in a number of areas. Why would he sign it?

So I'm hung up with the apparent contradiction and pic related is my attempt to get us out of the conundrum.

Anonymous ID: 85b2db Feb. 14, 2019, 8:03 p.m. No.5181619   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5181580

We do not freak or bail.

We trust the plan as much as ever.

We are just trying to figure out what's going on.

There's no question POTUS is going to be successful in keeping all of his promises. It's just a matter of trying to second guess where this train is going and what route it's going to take.

We know how the story ends: God wins.