Anonymous ID: 254708 Feb. 14, 2019, 10:55 p.m. No.5184315   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4321 >>4374 >>4428 >>4465 >>4559 >>4672 >>4732

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez accidentally exposes the left’s big lie

2-14-19

 

While collecting examples of the BIG LIE technique for a new Information Warfare thread, I ran across this curious WaPo article: an extremely negative critique of AOC's Green New Deal. Anons know it's not exactly a great plan (Kek!). But WaPo hates it, too? Not only do we have this critique but five links to other similar-sounding articles at the bottom.

 

So just what is going on here? Two possibilities come to mind:

1. Nancy Pelosi is taking back her turf.

2. The WaPo narrative is changing.

 

The reason to wonder about WaPo is that Q just posted a slew of new drops and when I went to analyze which ones pertained to controlling the narrative, there were EIGHTEEN examples (16 is you don't count the duplicates (the posts within posts). That's a lot. With that much attention from Q on Fake News, MSM Narratives, and Disinformation Campaigns, some kind of shift could be happening, even at a place a well-entrenched in the Deep State as WaPo.

 

(SEE ATTACHED POST FOR Q NOTES)

 

————-

Marc A. Thiessen

February 14 at 3:43 PM

 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s now infamous talking points on the Green New Deal are the most unintentionally honest explanation of the neo-socialism now gripping the Democratic Party. Too honest, apparently. After her office sent the “FAQ” to NPR, The Post and other news organizations, and posted a similar version on her congressional website, they were met with withering criticism — prompting Ocasio-Cortez to furiously backtrack, seeking to disown and discredit documents her office had produced, posted and distributed. Sorry, you don’t get to do that. Ocasio-Cortez told us what is really behind her Green New Deal. Now she, and the Democrats who endorsed her plan, have to live with it.

………………

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-accidentally-exposes-the-lefts-big-lie/2019/02/14/9a9adda6-3076-11e9-813a-0ab2f17e305b_story.html?

Anonymous ID: 254708 Feb. 14, 2019, 10:56 p.m. No.5184321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4428 >>4465 >>4559 >>4672 >>4732

>>5184315

 

RECENT Q POSTS ON CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE

2-14-19

 

'"Think for yourself, research for yourself, trust yourself, sheep no more."'

–#2683

 

When Q started posting again after a long "dry" period, there was a lot of focus on FALSE NARRATIVES & CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE. Here are relevant notes (with some quotes).

 

#2676 House intel launch: attempt to retain FALSE NARRATIVE

————

#2678 Russia, Russia, Russia; FAKE NEWS attacks continue? MSM=enemy of the people, "controlled"

————

#2681 Public Awakening; Narrative damage control

————

#2682 Article on Russia Collusion for Dems; define Projection; fight to win PUBLIC FAVORABILITY, to control the NARRATIVE; How do D's control the narrative? 4am "by design" narrative, POTUS/RUSSIA POTUS/RACIST narrative (evidence?)…Groupthink, THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO THINK FOR YOURSELF [moar]

————

#2683 WO/Social Media, how would we know the news? Fake News: CONTROL the narrative, Dilution of citizen voice/vote/natl independence; controlled media prevents mass awareness; if news not true, how are people informed? "Silence the people." [Tactics discussed] moar; see quote above…

————

#2884 Public border/wall fight necc. to bring awareness re true DEM intentions….Narrative Fight.

————

#2687 Why does the FAKE NEWS media continue to attack a so-called 'conspiracy'?

Alluded to 1000+ articles written about this movement by FAKE NEWS media machine

————

#2689 Logical thinking. #FactsMatter, You are the news now.

————

#2690 What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW? Racist? Logical thinking. #FactsMatter, You are the news now.

————

#2691 FAKE NEWS DESIGNED TO KEEP THE FAKE NARRATIVE IN PLAY; "You are witnessing the greatest 'DISINFORMATION' campaign to ever be pushed by a political party."…"The message must be direct. The WAR is very real."

————

#2697 [after a long list of firings, demotions] "Nothing being done? FAKE NEWS?"

————

#2699 "What does a dog do when he/she has a bone? You are the news now."

————

#2700 "Transparency & Prosecution: only way to save our Republic"; TRUTH WORKS, FACTS MATTER.

————

#2703, 2704 "Those who challenge have an agenda or are simply still asleep. The NARRATIVE has them."

————

#2714 "Memes are important."

————

#2715, 2716 "Why is the WASH POST leading the attack vs 'Q'?…Why are we attacked daily by the largest news co's on the world? Refs to "high follower count targeting to direct deep in narrative mob as method to remove"

————

Anonymous ID: 254708 Feb. 14, 2019, 11:08 p.m. No.5184423   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5184374

Yes, it sure looks like a WaPo hit job. What a novelty, I'm used to see them hitting Q or patriots. Maybe just damage control (because she really IS bat shit crazy). But yesterday, Dems were still happy in the bat shit camp. What happened, Dems? WaPo? (Visit from Q?)

Anonymous ID: 254708 Feb. 14, 2019, 11:17 p.m. No.5184532   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5184364

It can be hard to get noticed if you do commentary instead of "news." It's even harder during the day, when there is so much hard news. Anything like this theory–which is indeed a gem of both clear thinking and excellent narration–will get passed over, because it is "unsauced."

 

But if as Q suggests, "we are the news," it might be good to start thinking of ourselves that way, so we notice the diamonds in the grass.

Anonymous ID: 254708 Feb. 14, 2019, 11:36 p.m. No.5184689   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4706 >>4708 >>4743 >>4747 >>4753

>>5184593

Re: "Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct "deep in narrative" mob as method to remove"

 

This is a very intriguing comment from Q. Too easy to get fixated on Sather, but Q was directing our attention elsewhere, I think.

 

Anons discussed this a little but I didn't come away with a clear sense that we had arrived a Q's meaning.

 

First, I can understand the idea of a "deep in narrative" mob–this would be a True Believer mob–passionate, committed, driven entirely by emotion and thus dangerous, especially when provoked

 

But what is "high follower count" targeting? That's what's got me stumped. Sounds like it refers to a group with a lot of followers, but is that group targeted or doing the targeting?

 

And who or what is being removed?

Any ideas, guys?

Anonymous ID: 254708 Feb. 14, 2019, 11:40 p.m. No.5184710   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4728

>>5184644

You know, there is a space where we don't have to either accept or reject something outright but can keep it on a "not sure" shelf while evidence gradually proves or disproves what is alleged.