>>5186480 (Q)

> Border has more importance than what is publicly disclosed.

Summarize the QAnon narrative:

Military Intel vs Civilian Intel (Agencies).

CI is responsible for ALL the heinous acts (generally attributed to the US gov or mil) carried out against US citizens & foreign nations.

Where does CI get the bulk of its "black" budget from?

Illegal trade (drugs, human) across the Mexican border?

By cutting that off, is POTUS effectively crippling CI?

How does that reconcile existing/known EOs?

Even deeper…

What is CI's general MO, internationally: destabilize by arming and supporting insurgent minorities based within or next to the target?

Example: Libya

The population was disarmed, allowing a small group of "refugees" to destabilize the country and overrun the capital. Practice run?

What was EH/BO caught doing?

Supplying arms to Mexican Cartels?

What would the "migrant caravans" become were ready-positioned arms and supplied given to them as they approached the border? Under HRC, who would stop them?

US Mil, NG–would the media have even allowed for this?

With a media black-out, citizens be able to respond?

What would happen when citizens did finally respond?

Hate crimes?

Would the media have allowed HRC to turn on Patriots?

What if citizens had already been disarmed?

Another Libya?