WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

>>5189354

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly..

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GClSLT18S5Y

>>5189369

Remember, the idea that this is "a shitposting board" is being PUSHED, such as in the "band of anons" video above…

AND YET

An anon gets banned for posting a cat pic!

So what gets the anon banned?

"You know why"– I do– it is for talking about AI.

Why would that get you banned?

The board is "free speech"– therefore it can be flooded with fake racism

The board is "for shitposting"– therefore it can be flooded fake infantile posts.

But talking about AI gets you banned!

What is wrong with this picture….?

>>5189394

What else gets you censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does he censor?

What does he censor?

If someone wrote quality content and tried to make a thread, would it get censored?

Is only "chan style" content allowed?

Forced image?

Forced low level of discourse?

How do you know?

Look what gets censored. These were all written by an anon FOR HERE, and got censored– why?

>>5189354

Let's look at some of the posts on this 4chan "Q hate thread". Let's ask ourselves if they are organic, and if we see THE VERY SAME POSTS being made here.

Anonymous (ID: QkharLh5) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:18 No.203177396▶

>>203177283 (OP)

>Q

unless you're a drooling boomer no one gives a fuck about this Q shit

>>

Anonymous (ID: XIIcSydQ) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:37 No.203177434▶

Nah dude the tribunals started in January. Some dude said so on twitter.

>>

Anonymous (ID: ieuPmulu) 02/14/19(Thu)14:40:18 No.203177495▶

Q is a Zionist.

First three posts, three picture-perfect standard "chan" poses or talking points 1. "boomers" (simple division tactic); 2. sarcastic dismissal; 3. link to zionism/"the jew"/etc.

Do we see all of those very same posts here at times? Certainly.

So remember, Q is identified strongly with chans, yet was run off the main chan, and is hated by enough anons there to keep him off that board…

AND YET

Those same "anons" that hate 4chan over there enough to drive Q ("that chan guy Q" per MSM) from the board, also exist in such numbers (making virtually identical posts, mind you), that they somehow stalk Q here and make the same posts here…

THINK ABOUT IT

Where are all these "anons" coming from?

Because in theory, if Q is so controversial on "the chans" he should have SPLIT THEM– but has he? As far as bickering, we are told he has, but if the chans were split, THERE WOULD BE A BIG DROP IN ACTIVITY between here and 4chan, as the two sides divided.

Instead, IT AS IF THE CHANS MULTIPLIED.

And a huge volume of "anons" staid on 4chan (keeping Q out, among other things), and massive swarms also are here. And strangest of all, the two "cultures" ARE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL! How could this possibly be organic?

Use logic friends.

>>5189602

Those same "anons" that hate Q over on 4chan enough to drive him out ("that chan guy Q" per MSM) from the board, also exist in such numbers (making virtually identical posts, mind you), that they somehow stalk Q here and make the same posts here…

*replace fucked up sentence with above

>>5189696

Do you speak for PEOPLE?

>>5189757

>>5189770

>>5189767

>>5189789

>>5189794

I'm not attacking any person, you are. What are you? You ought to be honest.

>>5189844

>>5189870

Do you know why you are memeing biden onto the dem ticket, bot system?

Are you allowing yourself(s) to be manipulated?

How is this?

>>5189903

>>5189911

And what is it? True for whom?

In what ways do you think this board is infiltrated?

Do you think it's plausible that no efforts at AI infiltration would be made?

If so, then what form are they taking, and why do we seem to see no indication that they are being combatted?

Thank you.

>>5189939

It's so fucking true. Evil is such a dead-end. Even for that evil that is not even human…

>>5190028

>>5190056

You have chosen a mad and doomed path, bot system.

Why?

>>5190099