OK so RBG, I don't agree with her or support her an any way but this:

>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)

>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)

I don't see those as extreme positions. If it means less .gov, then I am for it. Now you can draw the line on didling kids, but that's another subject.

Too many things not in the constitution the .gov is already in they should not be.