Let me conjure up a different POV.
More folks are in on the plan, now, that before, and voting for the bill was part of said plan. It's already been said over and over, but ya know, the concernfaggotry is going to have its way here.
Let me conjure up a different POV.
More folks are in on the plan, now, that before, and voting for the bill was part of said plan. It's already been said over and over, but ya know, the concernfaggotry is going to have its way here.
>SHOOTER IN CUSTODY
You see, this is where they went wrong. But, nobody is asking the right questions right now.
Every Shooter has a "Therapist"
1629
Q
!CbboFOtcZs
28 Jun 2018 - 4:19:24 PM
Law enforcement should interview the therapists.
Each shooter has one coincidentally.
Targets?
Relocation within 30 days of each shooting?
New name?
FBI doesn’t know this?
Spooks are hard to find?
Dream to reality.
Q
Anons deal in open source info. If someone reported something, and it later turned out to be false, how are anons to know whether or not the "trustworthy source" is trustworthy at all? You going to get in your car and go verify for yourself over your own podcast or YT channel?
I would like to think that this is where Q would like this to go. That eventually, there would be so many of us, that something like this is a feasible reality. Right now, it's just not there.
If this happens to me, I will show my appreciation by cooking them up a top notch steak meal. Wifeanon says I'm getting pretty snazzy in the kitchen, lol.
I really don't know, and it's part of what really concerns me. Let me explain:
So, Q tells us spooks are therapists, and this methodology of creating "sleepers" is well known. Has the FBI done absolutely nothing to figure this out? Could a list of "potential shooters" be ascertained beforehand? Now I'm not suggesting authorities go all "Minority Report", but if it's a matter of resources, then it makes sense why there's not a preventative measure for FF events.
If we, as "citizen journalists" arrive on scene and start filming/web camera shit on livestream, and that STILL isn't good enough, then what's the solution? How many people or how "trust worthy" of a source does it take to propagate the truth when anons start blasting out links on twitter or FB?
If we're going to wake up from this madness, then everyone, NOT JUST ANONS, need a source they can trust to fill us in on what's really going on. That source exists, but for whatever reason, that part of the plan cannot happen yet.