Anonymous ID: fc6267 Feb. 15, 2019, 1:10 p.m. No.5194743   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5194699

This is a great topic anon, I think I ran across it yesterday, perhaps that was you. I noticed the chan culture very strongly when I came because I knew nothing about it before this board. Like many people here, I more or less felt called to be here and often found chan culture, while not objectionable, not exactly as….um….inspiring as QResearch culture.

Anonymous ID: fc6267 Feb. 15, 2019, 1:21 p.m. No.5194932   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5194693

 

POSTSCRIPT:

This Graveyard Shift meme isn't a "HOW TO BAKE"guide , it's moar like a humorous guide to Graveyard shift and my clumsy but (I hope) funny attempt to get a few more bakers on board. Because at the moment, the bakers from early shifts are making HEROIC efforts to keep a Baker on duty during the very late hours after they've already finished their late shift. Every single one of them has tried to stay as late as they can, until they literally fall asleep on their computers. (Last night, Q posted, as well (and the night before).

 

So the poster is sort of FOR KEKS but it speaks to something important. If you're a night owl interesting in baking, wow, could we ever use your help!

Anonymous ID: fc6267 Feb. 15, 2019, 1:25 p.m. No.5195001   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5018 >>5039 >>5051

>>5194970

You realize, anon, that some people have been posting FF's that aren't really happening? That's why sauce is especially important for violent emergent events. We cannot start reporting on things that aren't happening, it will blow our credibility and cause all sorts of confusion.

Anonymous ID: fc6267 Feb. 15, 2019, 1:34 p.m. No.5195143   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5248

>>5195051

Last night, I collected notables for baker when Q was here. One I collected was on a FF where the only source was someone on the scene. I put it in, but another anon said it wasn't real, so took it out.

 

So I'm kind of hyper-aware of the possibility of false FFs. I understand your point, I share your view. The question is: How do we achieve a balance between acting too quickly and acting too slowly?

Anonymous ID: fc6267 Feb. 15, 2019, 1:52 p.m. No.5195411   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5195209

Sometimes the way I find things out is notice the holes in coverage. For example, on the Alabama election fuckery digg, the NYT and WaPo "somehow" acquired a report revealing the motives of the Dem campaigners. But neither released the whole report. All there are , are six pages of really beat up looking paper (half the report). Why are these pages beat up? Why doesn't either paper publish the whole report? Why doesn't the MSM continue to follow up on this story? (I know the answer to that last question–they want the story to fall out of the news cycle.)

 

But it's enormously time consuming to learn things by noticing what's not there. But that's what we have to do with most open source material–because MSM won't report it.