Ok Anons, I admit. I believed RBG to be dead. And i pushed that HARD.

Q said she was being kept alive with off the market drugs.

It wasn’t to dispute what Q had said, but to force the obvious question of her health into the public realm.

So now journalists are saying that Q said she was dead? We know they are dishonest, but damn.

Anyways, lesson learned on my part. I’ll be scaling back so journalists can’t use what I had been pushing, against the movement.

The news today that she was in a closed door SC meeting I find interesting. Q states she is alive, but nothing much more into her specific current condition.

So i believe she was there. In what kind of capacity? Who knows. Maybe she was in a wheelchair and that’s why there were no photos.

Either way, Sebastian Gorka asking about her makes me question it. He is against Q but also believes she is dead? Maybe he is just trying to force the question on her situation as well.

I do believe things are being hidden on her behalf. And i wonder if this whole thing today was to help “resolve” the question of who was voting on her behalf.

I don’t know anons. I’m still going to be watching her close, just like many many others.

I also find it interesting that the newsweak article talked about how we would do side by sides of ears to determine if it’s really her. We are going to do it, because we know that it’s a proven scientific method of determining someone’s identity.

>>5198771

that’s true, thanks

Well i would like to say, i’ll continue to stay backed off on this, but i think it’ll end up being impossible for me to drop the subject.

It’s just such a huge thing. And with the next session coming into play on 19 Feb, i don’t know if she will show for it or not. The way things are going? Probably not. i will not be surprised if she fails to show. But if she does, i know i’ll be one of the once’s scrutinizing any pictures coming out of it.

>>5198732

thank you, interesting story

>>5198813

>Fast tracked through lower courts

Here is the issue, they can slow walk that case while the court places an injunction. Sessions was supposed to have put something in place to prevent nationwide injunctions in the lower courts.

So questions:

1: Can lower courts place an injunction on National Emergencies? I dont believe they have the authority, but doubt this has ever happened before. So this case would be precedent setting.

2: Could POTUS get the case in place in a non-9th circuit court and have themdfast track it to the SC so they can do an end around these clowns in california?

>>5198842

You couldn’t give us the OANN report instead of this idiots tweet?

Cmon anon, don’t give him attention