>>5199752 (pb)
>very based on talent and even every session is based on intent those that gave it and the one of the viewer.
>
>Three major filters for fleeting images. It is not quite science - not wrong just a lot of variables.
Yeah that's basically true for the scientific Staring at Goats version of RV…but not at all valid for dark field matter / energy manipulation. Some might call it a "mental" form of "time travel" but it's not….usually intent…for me intent would be "POTUS needs to be safe"…so every time there is a threat…one might say it gets "transmitted" to me…all thought is energy and creation….
there is more under the sun than man as conceived.
For me..when I take information and translate it into words and publish those words that are read in correct quarters the "thought" that goes into assessing what I said is "picked up by me".
The UK warning was super super important that they listen. They cancelled the trip, and from all I can tell sussed out the person…but when they announced the trip was back on…I did not feel they'd cleared all the threats…probably because I was picking up the intention of the SKY dude….because overall the trip felt safe.
It's strange how it works…if you've got it you really don't want to announce it…think those poor people wired up in the tanks in that pre crime movie the batshit insane Tom Cruise made.