Anonymous ID: fe250b Feb. 15, 2019, 8:50 p.m. No.5202037   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2298

>>5201856

 

Sauce: bill language >>> https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr21/BILLS-116hr21pcs.pdf

 

DHS regulations concerning "sponsors" >>https://www.acf.hhs.gov/orr/resource/unaccompanied-alien-children-released-to-sponsors-by-state

 

Relevant language of sponsorship "All sponsors must pass a background check."

 

Article: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-official-border-security-bill-does-not-contain-amnesty-poison-pills

 

"That ‘amnesty’ claim is based on section 224 of the budget – which appears, on first glance, to block the deportation of many people who are illegally in the U.S.

 

That’s because it states that no funds may be used to detain or deport any "sponsor" or "potential sponsor" of an "unaccompanied alien child." It adds that even any "member of a household" of a "potential sponsor" is now immune from deportation.

 

But a DHS official told Fox News that terms like "potential sponsor" have precise meanings in Department of Homeland Security regulations – meanings that severely limit the number of people the budget keeps safe from deportation.

 

For example, to be a "potential sponsor" according to the DHS regulations, one must file significant paperwork – such as showing ID (U.S. or foreign) and proof of residency. The adult applying must also submit documents about the child.

 

Further, because the bill only applies to kids who are unaccompanied, it does not provide protection for those bringing kids into the US."