Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 12:42 a.m. No.5204033   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5204026

dude, she legit needed help getting down a 2 inch step.

and her family is country as fuck.

 

But, she paid for lipo, and now she's rich as fuck with money she didn't earn, with a body she didn't earn, and… i think they made a show about her or something.

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 12:46 a.m. No.5204049   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4076

>>5204029

2 terms, walls, and "Trump was filled with the Light and now prays more or something".

 

No matter who the message comes through, be careful who you follow.

Don't mistake the messenger and their thoughts/intentions with the Message.

 

It's like Santo Daime.

You blast off ayahuasca style, and then on the come down, the "church" explains to you what just happened through their filter.

 

It's about the Message.

Not the messenger.

(Think Q. Use Logic.)

(And if you never actually know who was doing the typing… can you build a cult around them? Wouldn't it be better for future generation's sake to… just leave it as a concept everyone rallied around?)

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 12:51 a.m. No.5204076   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4105

>>5204049

It would be really fun if "Q is a LARP" in the sense that there is "No Q".

Q was a delivery system.

People typed things.

Interactions happened.

A lot of people spent an inordinate amount of time studying they're asses off and relaying their findings.

 

But there is no "Q".

I mean, obviously there is no one named "Q".

Could very well be a James Bond style thing where it's a position, not a person.

And even then, it's a team, and less than 10 people can like… verify something…

Buuuuut will they "need to"?

Future Proves Past… we won't neeed someone to "tell us".

 

But, somehow the choice to know "something" is yours; though what that something is and how you will know and the uniqueness of your being able to somehow choose an extent…

 

I guess that's just "looking into it" vs "i'm rooting for ya, but spare me the details so I can go about my day".

 

Kinda like the Bible.

Have you read it?

Has being here changed your perspective on what you're reading?

Is it Fake Good News?

Isn't everyone else's?

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 12:56 a.m. No.5204095   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4310 >>4418 >>4588

>>5204035

how fucking hard is it to sauce something?

I appreciate the picture, but save me a little time verifying shit while you're there.

 

It's so much eeeeeeeffooooooort on my part.

https://twitter.com/theblaze/status/1096680597060235264

 

Also… they cited investigation of Antifa as a problem?

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 1:02 a.m. No.5204121   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4162

>>5204105

>Which one?

Doesn't "God Win" in all of them?

 

>Not really. More like it confirmed my suspicions

Seems like a positive change from being a suspicious person, I'd say.

 

>Define your target subject better

Aren't they all the same? Pick one. Or 5, I don't care.

 

>See above.

They all say the saaaaame thing.

(but for the sake of context, belief in one religion generally leads to the rationalization that all others are wrong/incorrect, outside of those new-age what-have-yous.)

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 1:13 a.m. No.5204186   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4200

>>5204162

>Specificity matters. Define which "god" you're referencing.

The one with the name that encapsulates everything, but by the time you read it, "now" will have changed, and so the perspective and inflection. It's impossible to say unless you can predict the future and I can't do that.

 

Aaaand who gave you the Lords Prayer?

Which Lord?

I'm lively serious.

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 1:48 a.m. No.5204297   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5204280

Oh, and since you're totally not in the unofficial official workspace…

 

"in distance measured by [t]"

or c287, (na transform) element is dark green, a=128

forc145, (na transform) element is in the middle, a=61

distance in [t] from each (na transform) element to the a[1] element is equal to a (for these two examples)

You Fags gotta admit I'm at least trying to drum up some new ideas over here! :smiley:

That’s a direct calculation for those two c values.

First time that’s been done, even if it’s fluke.

 

Thoughts?

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 2:13 a.m. No.5204388   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4411

>>5204371

Also, Q didn't clear VQC off the boards.

That was one of the old BO's because it was a bit left field for the protocol and concernfagging at the time. Eventually a separate board was made to not have to worry about it, but it's here pretty often in "one way or another".

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 2:32 a.m. No.5204438   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4448

>>5204411

Well, that was the problem back then.

VQC breads were called RSA breads.

There weeeere about 4 of them before the mods wanted it to move somewhere else.

 

They were gaining a lot of steam and they weren't immediately relevant to Q back then, if that's… even a thing, really.

It was the wild west of Q, but I'm curious as to what else you remember…

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 2:48 a.m. No.5204481   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5204448

Sorry, I got distracted by something that made me giggle.

 

So, yo'll have to catch me up.

VQC was never pushing Flat Earth. Hollow Earth, totes. No denying that one. But then again, was just to get you to look into the underground tunnels and waterways?

And advanced tech… diiiiidn't Trump make Space Force a thing alongside dedicating the US to kicking ass in terms of AI? I swear that totally just happened'n'shit.

Nothing else on your graphic applies to anything I can think of involving VQC.

 

And VQC is a yuge Q supporter.

Think of it as more of a side quest for those who have the autism to…

Y'know…

Multitask.

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 3:11 a.m. No.5204566   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4618

>>5204558

Assuming there are now multi-digit letters, while also assuming you're limited to one go through of the alphabet.

 

Realistically, you could have Plan AB, Plan Ab, Plan aB, Plan ab… Plan ABC… Plan "math n!".

We have no idea how close to Z we got after the election.

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 3:26 a.m. No.5204631   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5204620

Bruh.

Sandmann: Hogg wondered why it was chill when folks came after him. He was a victim! But he was pushing an agenda.

Barron: Like Sandmann, there's no reason to include him in anything other than your best awesome. Hogg on the other hand is fair game for whatever the fuck you want.

Anonymous ID: 599fdb Feb. 16, 2019, 3:31 a.m. No.5204653   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>5204637

You do realize that Trump doesn't really have to run by the time this has really taken a firm grip on IRL, right?

 

And what better campaign stunt than a "saved the fuckin' world" victory parade?

 

I wonder if it'll even be in America, now that I think about it….