Barron is leading a private life and not commenting publicly on any topic. Not the case with Hogg. Hogg wants to force his agenda on the masses. The masses will retailiate.
your response makes no sense, Mrs 42 Posts
The op was about Barron. You do the typical shill tactic of introducing strawmen arguments that result in no argument whatsover.
There is no correlation between the two. Barron lives a private life and rarely is seen in public. Barron doesn't comment on "issues".
Sandmann was in public, participating in a peaceful protest.
Your attempt at equating the two is foolish and a huge fail.
Projection.
You dropped Hogg. You went from Barron to Hogg to Sandmann. Textbook strawman.
When one is advocating FOR life, they are usually PROTESTING abortion.
I don't mind occasionally debating with shills but you're a really bad shill. I'm done with wasting time with you, ma'am.