I agree with most here about "proof of life" concerning RBG.

Also, I have an issue with the other SCOTUS justices. At least 1 of the remaining 8 justices certainly must "know" that the issues that many have with RBG should be addressed and yet, all 8 of them stay silent. They are supposed to be the supreme, unbiased interpreters of the law according to the Constitution. Yet, they stay silent on RBG as if it's more important to them to cover for one of their colleagues. Is it a club, a law firm, or the Supreme Court of the US?

>>5204692

I agree, she prolly isn't dead yet. That would be somewhat difficult to hide from the public but not impossible.

My point is, one of the other justices should be responding to obvious concerns with her contributing to decisions while not being "seen". At the very least, commenting on whether this is proper; is there precedence?; have they seen her and can verify everything is as it should be?

The Trump-Kim summit 11 days from today has made me nostalgic.

Those oldies but goodies!

>>5204802

There IS a resemblance but, that's not Pepe.