Haven't done a full dig on this, not sure if it has been addressed in the past. If so please disregard. But looking into Q posts I noticed an oddity with the filename on pictures attached.

For example:

Post 456 has a name of: 72E0C7D9-EB8A-49A7-8367-1190ACAD8F9F followed by the appropriate image file type. How does this relate to anything? Well disregarding the filetype and utilizing a normal search I couldn’t find anything. However, when you look at Wikileaks.org and specific categories you will find something interesting:

Going to the HRC Email Archive you can see an Email-ID search option:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

Searching the name of the file as an email-ID directs you to an E-mail.

https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult

The interesting thing is that the filename works for the other Email-ID stored archives:

Podesta

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult

AKP

https://www.wikileaks.org/akp-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult

DNC

https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/72e0c7d9-eb8a-49a7-8367-1190acad8f9f#searchresult

If the filename works for the HRC Archive it seems to work for the other three. Now some of these filenames won’t propagate a response from WikiLeaks, I am assuming that they may be in reference to either one of the other categories, or perhaps another search engine entirely.

Is Q pointing us to these emails, via the email-ID search function on Wikileaks?

Is Wikileaks changing the ID after the Q posts?

Not sure which way this is going, perhaps Q could give an answer.

I just have to ask, what are the odds that these filenames would reference these emails in the Wikileaks database, and on the ones I checked, reference four separate archives. Seems pretty low to me.

The posts that I have checked that work are: 456, 684, 685, 686, 865, 868, 880, 892… at this point I moved into further posts to see if it was still happening…1951, 2721, 2729.

Anyhow, I thought you would all be interested.

>>5204768

I Thoroughly Enjoy what you just Found, by clicking the image you collected a different filename: 27e35eb54205058d3fc50cafb5e941d3fa74ed5720c550d1c845c577fa3e24c2

When you look at:

https://qanon.pub/ the image name is:

C80BEA60-AF66-40AD-A81D-8685907155CA, which does not produce a result.

It appears that some of the filenames directly from https://qanon.pub/ will result in a hit, while others require the alternative selection option.

There are a tremendous amount of filenames throughout the Q posts, and as it seems multiple ways to view them. I only got through a fraction before I posted.

Hopefully, we can decipher some information from these emails, which I have yet to dig upon, and how they relate to the corresponding Q post.

Thank You Anons, you all Brightened my Day. I truly hope this will be a fruitful path.

>>5204819

It appears that WikiLeaks gave these emails the same email-ID. Is that based off a preset by the number it was entered into their database as a primary key? Not sure, but would be unlikely from a Database Manager stand point.

Yet, it appears, and I only checked a handful, that if the filename name works for the HRC archive it works for, Podesta, DNC, and AKP.

I did not check any of the other categories in the WikiLeaks database and when you do a general search, for the ones I checked, it did not propagate results.

It did not dig on the emails, when it appeared to be a trend over several files I brought it to the boards. More eyes on the better. It appears only emails as of now, but not sure where it could lead.

>>5204849

Fantastic!!!!

>>5204905

Seems that could be the case, the search function is only accessing numerals and only if they are the beginning of the string. Yikes…sorry Anons…I am only glad it was spotted early before others wasted their precious time on this.

Should have debugged more prior to bringing to the boards.

>>5205044

We always got tomorrow!! Baker can you please remove 'pic filename links to wikileaks emails' from NOTABLES, no point in wasting others time. Off to bed, may today bring more Winning!

>>5205068

Seems to be an Error my friend. The WikiLeaks website was only searching the initial numerals and ignoring the remainder.

I apologize for the time you spent on this.