Anonymous ID: c78800 Feb. 16, 2019, 4:16 a.m. No.5204819   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4948

>>5204688

Stellar work, Anon. I remember when Q dropped that file. We searched and searched. I don't recall that anyone traced it to a Wikileaks file. I also seem to recall that code was dropped around the same time Q hinted about audio and video files that remained to be dug. "Archive Offline." But I could be wrong about that. (So much to remember, kek.)

 

Still, I am confused. I get that you are saying the file connects to a number of files collected at Wikileaks, and the names/organizations certainly raise a flag.

 

But are you saying that all of these emails are named the exact same file name as in Wikileaks categorized by that file name/code?

 

Or that there was an attachment connected to these emails? And if an attachment, can you see the what type of file it is? A video? Jpeg? Pdf, etc.?

 

In other words, what kind of file is it?

Anonymous ID: c78800 Feb. 16, 2019, 4:27 a.m. No.5204865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4959 >>5186

>>5204801

 

NOTABLE from Lawfag

 

From Cover-Ups To Secret Plots: The Murky History Of Supreme Justices' Health

January 23, 20195:00 AM ET

 

For the first time in her 25-year career on the Supreme Court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was not on the bench to start the new year.

 

After the 85-year-old justice was operated on for lung cancer, she decided to work from home rather than return to the court two weeks after surgery. She's expected to make a full recovery and be back at the court soon. A fair amount is known about Ginsburg's cancers and surgery, but the history of Supreme Court justices and their health is murkier.

 

That's, in part, because the justices โ€” to this day โ€” prefer to keep these matters to themselves as much as possible. But also justices didn't used to be as public facing as they are today, what with writing books and doing interviews, let alone appearing in Oscar-nominated documentaries or having feature films based on their lives.

 

Justices like their privacy, too

 

Ginsburg has been more transparent than most, revealing the basic details of each of her three bouts with cancer โ€” in 1999, 2009 and now โ€” and disclosing other, less dire health issues from time to time.

 

Other justices, however, have been less open about their health. Justice Anthony Kennedy's 2005 heart stent was only disclosed after it had to be fixed a year later.

 

Supreme Court Revives Trump's Ban On Transgender Military Personnel, For Now

NATIONAL

Supreme Court Revives Trump's Ban On Transgender Military Personnel, For Now

Justice Antonin Scalia had health issues that only became publicly known after his sudden death in 2016. And Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at age 90, only recently disclosed that he made the decision to step down after a fumbled dissent from the bench prompted a visit to his doctor and news that he had suffered a mini-stroke.

 

While modern Supreme Court justices can and do sometimes hide their ailments, it is much harder to do now than in earlier eras โ€” and when something is wrong, it shows.

 

In 2005, it was painfully clear for most of the court term that Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who had been operated on for thyroid cancer, was mortally ill. Throughout the term, Rehnquist released almost no information about his health, and, at the end of the term, he decided against retiring, only to die during the court's summer break.

 

Continued at:

For the first time in her 25-year career on the Supreme Court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was not on the bench to start the new year.

 

After the 85-year-old justice was operated on for lung cancer, she decided to work from home rather than return to the court two weeks after surgery. She's expected to make a full recovery and be back at the court soon. A fair amount is known about Ginsburg's cancers and surgery, but the history of Supreme Court justices and their health is murkier.

 

That's, in part, because the justices โ€” to this day โ€” prefer to keep these matters to themselves as much as possible. But also justices didn't used to be as public facing as they are today, what with writing books and doing interviews, let alone appearing in Oscar-nominated documentaries or having feature films based on their lives.

 

Justices like their privacy, too

 

Ginsburg has been more transparent than most, revealing the basic details of each of her three bouts with cancer โ€” in 1999, 2009 and now โ€” and disclosing other, less dire health issues from time to time.

 

Other justices, however, have been less open about their health. Justice Anthony Kennedy's 2005 heart stent was only disclosed after it had to be fixed a year later.

 

Supreme Court Revives Trump's Ban On Transgender Military Personnel, For Now

NATIONAL

Supreme Court Revives Trump's Ban On Transgender Military Personnel, For Now

Justice Antonin Scalia had health issues that only became publicly known after his sudden death in 2016. And Justice John Paul Stevens, who retired at age 90, only recently disclosed that he made the decision to step down after a fumbled dissent from the bench prompted a visit to his doctor and news that he had suffered a mini-stroke.

 

While modern Supreme Court justices can and do sometimes hide their ailments, it is much harder to do now than in earlier eras โ€” and when something is wrong, it shows.

 

In 2005, it was painfully clear for most of the court term that Chief Justice William Rehnquist, who had been operated on for thyroid cancer, was mortally ill. Throughout the term, Rehnquist released almost no information about his health, and, at the end of the term, he decided against retiring, only to die during the court's summer break.

 

Continuedโ€ฆ

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/23/686208930/from-cover-ups-to-secret-plots-the-murky-history-of-supreme-justices-health