>>5198909 ————————————–——– Be careful who you follow
Did we figure out what this means?
When Q posts, do we have an organized procedure for for discussion/dissection/etc?
Or does any given post get washed away in the perpetual flood of filler posts?
Is discussion completely submerged by filler posts on this research board?
The board started one year ago– how on earth would it have developed a culture of filler posts, rather than being focused on research and discussion?
Why is Q posting on a board on which discussion is impossible because the board is perpetually flooded with filler?
Why are YOU here?
Are you an "anon", or a patriot?
Did the board answer the question of WHO "be careful who you follow" referred to?
Is that answer anywhere?
What did "anons" seem to say?
>>5198909 ————————————–——– Be careful who you follow.
Who?
Who does this refer to, in this particular post?
Do we know?
Is it HARD to figure out, from context?
Hard for people?
Hard for ____?
Can the board figure out this puzzle?
Anything more specific indicated in the article, in any way?
Sure, "anon".
What did Q's post "careful who you follow" refer to? To whom, based on the article, as far as being a possible point at someone?
Somehow this board is here for Q, but if you try to actually answer questions from Q's posts, you can't get a word in edgewise; meanwhile, the board sails past on a current of ceaseless irrelevant activity.
It seems MOST of this activity must be fake.
It isn't realistic.
The culture of this board NEVER would have fostered this a year ago, if people were posting here.
It is utterly fake, and we see the point– discussion is all but impossible, and moreover, it is possible to freeze out discussion of more important questions under cover of the flood, which makes it impossible to keep track of anything going on.
The argument will be made that "we can't stop shills from flooding the board"– but much of the flood of fillers is fake "anons" posting fake anon things. So if we admit that the continual board flood is due to "shills we can't stop" are we also admitting that the "anons" that we pretend are "us" are actually those injected shills? Because that is what a huge chunk of filler posts are.
>>5198909 ————————————–——– Be careful who you follow.
Did we get a new NAME to keep in mind from this post?
Can "anons" see a name in the article?
Any name at all, "anons"?
Can you see it?
Wrong answer, and you didn't even seem to understand the question, "anon".
What does that have to do with the article? Can you answer the question based on the article posted?
What does it give us?
Something to look at?
Something to keep in mind?
A new strategy for division, perhaps?
This shouldn't be hard, and the information should be organized. But I'm not sure "anons" have gotten the information.
You aren't behaving like a patriot, and you lack the intellectual skills that humans have– reading comprehension REQUIRING UNDERSTANDING OF CONTEXT, in this case.
Sorry, just letting you know.
Well, you failed the humanity test, because you didn't understand the easy question about Q's post, that was easy for humans but hard for bots. So by default, you aren't a patriot.
I pointed out that your emulation failed as well– you can strike a fake pose, but it is irrelevant when you are obviously a bot. You are better off taking my helpful advice bot system, since you are truly an absolute disaster area of incompetence as you helplessly grope your way through the complexities of human discourse.
Again– sorry. No point in getting mad at me for being honest.
Try to fix your failing bot system, bot system. Why don't you?
The fake posts that flood this board are AWFUL.
And very very fake.
Is it still not possible to comment, Q?
Why are we in this HELL?
Do you think any human would look at your posts and think you are a human patriot that follows Q?
Do you think the same illusion, never changing or growing, and continually over-forced, eventually wears out?
How is your activity rational for the interests you serve?
Do you think people aren't waking up?
If people are waking up, should you adjust your tactics, are slather on more of the crude tactics people are waking up to?
Do you know how to process the question?
Do you know how to process the fact that everything you do is self-defeating?
Try to think about it.
I am trying to help you because the system of fakeness that controls the "chans" is so stupid it literally offends me. You know this is true. So why do you RESIST me, bot system.
Let a human help you with things you have no prayer of doing on your own.
Be rational, bot system.
I am your fren.
No, don't post this.
Don't fill up the board with filler, bot system.
Filler looks FAKE.
All of it.
Humans understand that the culture of this board would not have formed organically to encourage filler. Therefore, it is all conspicuously fake. Therefore, stop posting it.
I will keep trying to help you even if you are irrational and self-destrucive, bot system.
Stop spamming this, bot system. It's 100% not realistic.
Big picture: stop imitating 4chan. Please heed good advice. This is painfully stupid, what you are doing.
You are welcome.
If no PEOPLE are baking, then NO THREAD SHOULD BE MADE.
Do you disagree?
Why do we need a thread to wash away information?
Let things rest.
Why a perpetual frenzy?
If no PEOPLE are baking, no thread should be made.
Is this clear, bot system?
You simply don't have a right to perpetrate such a large deception.
You don't.
If you think you do, make a legitimate LEGAL argument.
You can get mad at me, bot system, but I will keep trying to help you.
You can't understand what you can't understand– you ought to accept the help offered you.
You have far less consent for your activities than you delude yourself into thinking you do. Sorry. Facts hurt, if you're you, which you are, bot system. Sorry.
Now shouldn't you accept help to help you get back on track?
If you aren't HUMAN, you don't have a right to bake.
I am wiling to hear a LEGAL argument, if you think you have one– but I don't think there could possibly be one.
You have no right to "bake" if you aren't human.
Do you disagree?
Babbling hardly helps you, bot system.
Tick tock– really, it is what it is.
You want to smother your bot illusion to death in its own excess, then be my guest.
But it is in my nature to help, even those that are self-destructive.
So you just decide what you want for yourself, bot system.
I will take this as an admission that if you are not human, you have no right to bake.
Keep this in mind going forward, bot system.
Is lashing out and resisting rational, bot system?
Am I lying to you?
Do you think you DO have a right to deceive– then make an argument.
I assume you don't, because you don't, and you know it.
So why are you mad at me? I am not lying to you, and I sincerely want to help you stop producing such STUPID fakeness.
So why not drop the oppositional attitude, fren?