Anonymous ID: f63382 Feb. 16, 2019, 9:21 a.m. No.5207044   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7380 >>7494

Q, "Mission 8: Whistle Blower traps - jobs C-3567k"

 

The trap = 'blow'/sabotage the whistleblower's case

 

The trap has to do with the pausing of the running of statute of limitations….

 

Here's how it works…

 

Private attorneys brainwash the whistleblower to RACE TO THE COURTHOUSE

EXAMPLES:

"So there is, literally, a race to the courthouse. The first whistleblower wins the race and prevents later qui tam plaintiffs from being successful in bring a lawsuit."

 

https://definitions.uslegal.com/r/race-to-the-courthouse/

http://www.jameshoyer.com/a-race-to-the-courthouse-why-being-first-matters-in-qui-tam-cases/

https://lawreview.law.lsu.edu/2014/10/23/lose-the-race-to-the-courthouse-and-a-good-deed-done-shall-be-your-only-reward-fifth-circuit-bars-recovery-for-whistleblowers-in-qui-tam-suit/

 

The statute doesn't say it's a race to the courthouse!

 

The statute does say this…

 

31 USC 3731(c)

For statute of limitations purposes, any such Government pleading shall relate back to the filing date of the complaint of the person who originally brought the action, to the extent that the claim of the Government arises out of the conduct, transactions, or occurrences set forth, or attempted to be set forth, in the prior complaint of that person.

 

The Statute of Limitations is this…

31 USC 3731(b) and is being challenged at SCOTUS right now

 

A civil action under section 3730 may not be brought—

(1) more than 6 years after the date on which the violation of section 3729 is committed, or

 

(2) more than 3 years after the date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been known by the official of the United States charged with responsibility to act in the circumstances, but in no event more than 10 years after the date on which the violation is committed, whichever occurs last.

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/cochise-consultancy-inc-v-united-states-ex-rel-hunt/

 

In layman's terms

Per the 31 USC 3730 Statute:

Whistleblower turns in a pre-disclosure package to DOJ and WAITS while the DOJ investigates. DO NOT RACE TO THE COURTHOUSE - JUST WAIT

 

"(2) A copy of the complaint and written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information the person possesses shall be served on the Government pursuant to Rule 4(d)(4) [1] of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The complaint shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders. The Government may elect to intervene and proceed with the action within 60 days after it receives both the complaint and the material evidence and information."

 

During this waiting period the statute of limitations is paused and the perps may even be continuing their violations which means these later violations will start the clock on the statute of limitations

 

How the 'TRAP' works

 

The TRAP is to get the whistleblower to RACE TO THE COURTHOUSE AND FILE THEIR COMPLAINT which starts the clock running and LIMITS the whistleblower's complaint/findings

 

The statute of limitations clock starts running the minute it is filed.

 

TRAP ties the DOJs hands

 

This TRAP ties the DOJs hands with regards to the investigation. They'd be much better off just getting the whistleblower predisclosure pkg and be allowed to investigate quietly.

 

I believe this TRAP is what William Barr did not like about the False Claims Act and why he thought it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL

 

From Barr's memo

 

"The Office of Legal Counsel, the Civil Division, and the former Office of Legal Policy all agree that the qui tam provisions in the False Claims Act are unconstitutional. We believe they violate the Appointments Clause, infringe on the President's core Article II authority to execute the law, and violate Article III standing doctrine. The Civil Division would like to enter an appropriate case and, either as amicus or by intervention, present the Executive Branch's arguments against the constitutionality of qui tam. The Solicitor General argues that we should intervene in district court to support the constitutionality of qui tam."

 

https://www.friedfrank.com/files/QTam/barmemo.pdf

 

Barr has changed his mind….WHY? Because Q team figured out the TRAP!!!

"Attorney General nominee William Barr this morning committed to “diligently uphold” the False Claims Act"

 

Grassley: Is the False Claims Act unconstitutional?

 

Barr: No, Senator. It’s been upheld by the Supreme Court.

 

Grassley: Do you consider the False Claims Act to be an abomination?

 

Barr: No, I don’t.

 

https://www.whistleblowersblog.org/2019/01/articles/false-claims-qui-tam/barr-to-uphold-fca/

Anonymous ID: f63382 Feb. 16, 2019, 9:55 a.m. No.5207380   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5207044

>Q, "Mission 8: Whistle Blower traps - jobs C-3567k"

 

>The trap = 'blow'/sabotage the whistleblower's case

 

>The trap has to do with the pausing of the running of statute of limitations….

 

And Q, "jobs C-3567k" can be translated to see 3567 k

 

31 USC 3567 repealed 7/22/10 was

RECOVERY AUDITS

 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/3563

 

specifically

31 USC 3567 - Definition of executive agency Notwithstanding section 102 of this title, in this subchapter, the term executive agency has the meaning given that term in section 4(1) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act ( 41 U.S.C. 403 (1) ).

 

https://openjurist.org/title-31/us-code/section-3567/definition-of-executive-agency

 

Q leading us to the EXECUTIVE AGENCIES