You and I share a brain. I've actually been thinking about this for at least a year. The biggest issue I've been thinking about is shill prevention. I think that some type of a quorum is needed to keep that at bay. Doesn't matter ultimately though because it's just one of the many problems we would have to counter.
Unknown unknowns and all that.
Have you seen this?
http://ogp.me/
Agree. I've been thinking that the simplest way to start would be to just map out the notables.
Nice timestamp.
Q Patriots in control?
[ES]
[Jared Cohen]
>Be careful who you follow.
Many in the media are saying that this funding bill in a #win for POTUS when it's full of landmines. I'm not sure we can trust MM.
>Careful who you follow
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-official-border-security-bill-does-not-contain-amnesty-poison-pills.amp
I read this again.
Chip Roy says '"This 'deal' provides de facto amnesty for anyone claiming to be even in the household of a potential sponsor of an unaccompanied alien minor," Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, wrote on Twitter Thursday.'
…
Chris Chmielenski, the deputy director of NumbersUSA, which fights for lower immigration levels and which urged President Trump to veto the budget
…
(Mark Krikorian?) The Center for Immigration Studies, which favors lower immigration levels, tweeted that “the spending bill would give local governments in the Rio Grande (all of which are heavily Democratic) the ability to veto the fence. If those blue municipalities don't agree with DHS, the fence can't get built.”
Trust Gorka?