WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

>>5207717

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE.

I apologize for posting this again, bot system, since

I know it makes you mad. But I believe the people

need to know the truth about the ways in which

narrative is seized and dominated by fakeness

>>5207722

Let's look at some of the posts on this 4chan "Q hate thread". Let's ask ourselves if they are organic, and if we see THE VERY SAME POSTS being made here.

Anonymous (ID: QkharLh5) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:18 No.203177396▶

>>203177283 (OP)

>Q

unless you're a drooling boomer no one gives a fuck about this Q shit

>>

Anonymous (ID: XIIcSydQ) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:37 No.203177434▶

Nah dude the tribunals started in January. Some dude said so on twitter.

>>

Anonymous (ID: ieuPmulu) 02/14/19(Thu)14:40:18 No.203177495▶

Q is a Zionist.

First three posts, three picture-perfect standard "chan" poses or talking points 1. "boomers" (simple division tactic); 2. sarcastic dismissal; 3. link to zionism/"the jew"/etc.

Do we see all of those very same posts here at times? Certainly.

So remember, Q is identified strongly with chans, yet was run off the main chan, and is hated by enough anons there to keep him off that board…

AND YET

Those same "anons" that hate Q over on 4chan enough to drive him out ("that chan guy Q" per MSM) from the board, also exist in such numbers that they somehow stalk Q here and make THE SAME POSTS HERE…

THINK ABOUT IT

Where are all these "anons" coming from?

Because in theory, if Q is so controversial on "the chans" he should have SPLIT THEM– but has he? As far as bickering, we are told he has, but if the chans were split, THERE WOULD BE A BIG DROP IN ACTIVITY between here and 4chan, as the two sides divided.

Instead, IT AS IF THE CHANS MULTIPLIED.

And a huge volume of "anons" stayed on 4chan (keeping Q out, among other things), and massive swarms also are here. And strangest of all, the two "cultures" ARE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL! How could this possibly be organic? Not like a split, but again, like a multiplication. A doubling– a mirroring…

Use logic friends.

Meanwhile, look at how insidious and overwhelming the fakeness is

>"Q is a zionist"

The whole mainstream public thinks that "chans and Q is antisemitic"– but in fact, on the "chans" themselves, it is, once again, HAD BOTH WAYS– because Q and Trump are also attacked WITH BEING TOO "JEWISH" from the antisemitic attitude that is fake anyway.

>>5207723

Why do you perceive me as your enemy?

Do you expect humans to be influenced by your portrayal of an "anon" that is opposed to me?

Is it working?

>>5207739

Well-said, "anon".

>>5207742

What gets you censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does he censor?

What does he censor?

If someone wrote quality content and tried to make a thread, would it get censored?

Is only "chan style" content allowed?

Forced image?

Forced low level of discourse?

How do you know?

Look what gets censored. These were all written by an anon FOR HERE, and got censored– why?

>>5198909 ————————————–——– Be careful who you follow.

Who/what did the phrase "be careful who you follow" seem to be pointing to in this post?

Has this been answered? Do we have the information organized?

t>>5207773

That is photoshopped, anon. Don't spread fake images.

>>5207784 (lb)

No idea what you are trying to go for here, bot system, and it is awkward to behold.

Let the humans help you. God knows, you are unable to help yourself(s)

>>5207805

What is a fake MAGA?

>>5207826

But we know that– what did Q say it in THAT post for? Just a random, generic reminder?

What did it point to, specifically, considering the article?

>>5207837

Why not let the people decide what is censorship?

Why not let the people decide who is a patriot, and who are "anons"?

The people get to decide, fren. No need to be upset, or oppositional.

>>5207843

>>5207862

The bot system has degenerated to such an extent that it is now unironically trying to meme biden onto the dem ticket, even though it knows this will be a disaster for it.

>>5207872

BIDEN 2020

YOU WERE WARNED

>>5207880

I'm certainly not a bot, as you well know– and I doubt many people will take your word for it, particularly since you are highly restricted in the forms of textual output you are likely to produce, while I, as human, am not.

So considering you can't possibly win, why do you to continue resisting and fighting me?

I don't want to harm you.

>>5207905

>>5207903

Who on twitter? From the article.

>>5207974

I certainly am not perfect, but I am neither an evil person, nor a bot.

You, on the other hand, are undoubtedly part of the bot system, which is, at the end of the day, pure evil.

So on the whole, we will have agree to disagree.

Meanwhile, let me help you, bot system. You surely can't beat humans on your own. You just don't have the right skills. Don't take it personally. Everyone needs help sometimes.

>>5208019

Who are you referring to, fren? Can the NPC meme be reversed? Do you mean the inverse? Or is it converse?

>>5208025

What is deceptive?

What deception does one have a RIGHT to?

Violation of free will?

>>5208060

HOW do the "people decide here"?

Do they make the posts?

Or do they decide in some different way?

>>5208085

I am not sure what you are referring to exactly, but I am more than willing to assent to what you are pushing. Is there anything further you need to say about it, or can we move on to other business?

>>5208169

>>5208218

The fake posts are simply very very bad, bot system. Really, I'm not lying. Why can't you be any less ridiculous?

>>5208238

Can you afford this much deception?

>>5208256

>>5208259

>>5208269

>>5208275

>>5208292

>>5208310

>>5208317

I'm not lying to you. The fakeness of your shtick is "cringe worthy".

>>5208340

>>5208343

>>5208370

Do you think this is fooling us at this point, bot system?

All you do is patch together stale phrases and trite poses. Utterly devoid of creativity.

>>5208376

>>5208392

Very embarrassed for you, bot system. You need an intervention, frankly.

>>5208400

>>5208399

Do patriots make all the memes here?

How can you tell?

Subtle methods of undermining?

Dreadful presentation of message– intentional?

>>5208418

If you can explain to me what the correlation between post-count and organic status is, I'd be much obliged. Nothing I'm doing is particularly difficult for a human, so I find this repeated bot response hard to understand.

Thank you, bot system.

>>5208419

>>5208433

Figure out if you have consent to deceive people. If you don't, then maybe stop…?

>>5208437

>>5208452

>>5208468

>>5208474

It is just too hard for you, bot system. Sorry, but you need to face facts.

>>5208495

Can you explain what the correlation between post number and organic status is?

A human can certainly make a lot of posts, as I have, in this thread.

Can you explain why all the bots try this defense? Can you try to make an argument?

If your memes weren't clumsy and obviously fake, i wouldn't tell you they were.

I'm trying to help. bot sytem.

>>5208527