Anonymous ID: 66fee1 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:48 a.m. No.5207882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7902 >>8077

>>5207814

>>5207814

>(You)

 

By having a crowd based graph, when a new q is available, it will allow various anons to split up the research and collectively build out the links…

 

How many times have we found extensive webs of links and relationships? How are they archived? How do we search and recall it? How do we visualize it?

 

If you think normies are going to read through thousands of posts of gay porn, muh jew, etc to extract knowledge… your fooling yourself.

Anonymous ID: 66fee1 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:52 a.m. No.5207922   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7938

>>5207884

>http://ogp.me/

 

Agreed. I think that we could do something along the lines of "voting system" where validated people review the entries and commit.

 

I gotta jet, we need to setup a discussion board to continue this.

 

I'll checkout your link.

Anonymous ID: 66fee1 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:55 a.m. No.5207956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5207902

>(You)

 

Possible. Also need to ingest all of qposts and be sure to monitor for more. These represent core concepts that will be linked in/out later based on research.

 

Again, we need a place to discuss.

Anonymous ID: 66fee1 Feb. 16, 2019, 11:28 a.m. No.5208462   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5208425

>https://www.msnbc.com/andrea-mitchell-reports/watch/-alsicebucketchallenge–andrea-mitchell-319529027550

 

i read there were messages sent but no responses.