Anonymous ID: f36806 Feb. 16, 2019, 11:44 a.m. No.5208639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8711

RE: CIA killing of JFK

FTR #1054, FTR #1055 and FTR #1056 Interviews #23, #24 and #25 with Jim DiEugenio about “Destiny Betrayed”

 

"For the Record"

 

On December 22, 1963, Harry Truman wrote an editorial that was published in the Washington Post. The former President wrote that he had become "disturbed by the way the CIA had become diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of government." He wrote that he never dreamed that this would happen when he signed the National Security Act. he thought it would be used for intelligence analysis, not "peacetime cloak and dagger operations." He complained that the CIA had now become "so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue–and a subject for Cold War enemy propaganda." Truman went as far as suggesting its operational arm be eliminated. He concluded with the warning that Americans have grown up learning respect for "our free institutions and for our ability to maintain a free and open society. There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over out historic position and I feel hat we need to correct it." . . . . Former CIA Director (and then Warren Commission member) Allen Dulles visited Truman and attempted to get him to retract the statement. He dissembled about then CIA chief John McCone's view of the editorial. The focal point of the first two programs is the dramatic changes in U.S. foreign policy that occurred because of JFK's assassination.

 

Something Very Creepy about the BUNDY's

check G.H. Hamilton, spitting image of a Bundy

Culture Engineering via Modern Art Movement.

Normalizing pathological and empty Art.

Anonymous ID: f36806 Feb. 16, 2019, 11:50 a.m. No.5208711   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5208639

[cont.]

Analysis in FTR #1056 continues the analysis of Kennedy's foreign policy and concludes with riveting discussion of the striking policy undertakings of the Kennedy administration in the area of civil rights. Jim has written a marvelous, 4-part analysis of JFK's civil rights policy. Discussion of JFK's foreign policy and how his murder changed that builds on, and supplements analysis of this in FTR #1031, FTR #1032 and FTR #1033. Lyndon Baines Johnson reversed JFK's foreign policy initiatives in a number of important ways. When the United States reneged on its commitment to pursue independence for the colonial territories of its European allies at the end of the Second World War, the stage was set for those nations' desire for freedom to be cast as incipient Marxists/Communists. This development was the foundation for epic bloodshed and calamity. Jim details then Congressman John F. Kennedy's 1951 fact-finding trip to Saigon to gain an understanding of the French war to retain their colony of Indochina. (Vietnam was part of that colony.) In speaking with career diplomat Edmund Gullion, Kennedy came to the realization that not only would the French lose the war, but that Ho Chi Minh and the Viet Minh guerrillas enjoyed great popular support among the Vietnamese people. This awareness guided JFK's Vietnam policy, in which he not only resisted tremendous pressure to commit U.S. combat troops to Vietnam, but planned a withdrawal of U.S. forces from Vietnam. Perhaps the most important change made after JFK's assassination was Johnson's negation of Kennedy's plans to withdraw from Vietnam. LBJ cancelled Kennedy's scheduled troop withdrawal, scheduled personnel increases and implemented the 34A program of covert operations against North Vietnam. Executed by South Vietnamese naval commandos using small, American-made patrol boats, these raids were supported by U.S. destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin, which were electronically "fingerprinting" North Vietnamese radar installations. The electronic fingerprinting of North Vietnamese radar was in anticipation of a pre-planned air war, a fundamental part of a plan by LBJ to involve the United States in a full-scale war in Southeast Asia. Destiny Betrayed by Jim DiEugenio; Skyhorse Publishing [SC]; Copyright 1992, 2012 by Jim DiEugenio; ISBN 978-1-62087-056-3; pp. 368-371. . . . . Clearly now that the withdrawal was imminent, Kennedy was going to try and get the rest of his administration on board to his way of thinking. Not only did this not happen once Kennedy was dead, but the first meeting on Vietnam afterwards was a strong indication that things were now going to be cast in a sharply different tone. This meeting took place at 3:00 p.m. on November 24. . . . Johnson's intent was clear to McNamara. He was breaking with the previous policy. The goal now was to win the war. LBJ then issued a strong warning: He wanted no more dissension or division over policy. Any person who did not conform would be removed. (This would later be demonstrated by his banning of Hubert Humphrey from Vietnam meetings when Humphrey advised Johnson to rethink his policy of military commitment to Vietnam.) . . . . The reader should recall, this meeting took place just forty-eight hours after Kennedy was killed. . . . . . . . Therefore, on March 2, 1964, the Joint Chiefs passed a new war proposal to the White House. This was even more ambitious than the January version. It included bombing, the mining of North Vietnamese harbors, a naval blockade, and possible use of tactical atomic weapons in case China intervened. Johnson was now drawing up a full scale battle plan for Vietnam. In other words, what Kennedy did not do in three years, LBJ had done in three months. Johnson said he was not ready for this proposal since he did not have congress yet as a partner and trustee. But he did order the preparation of NSAM 288, which was based on this proposal. It was essentially a target list of bombing sites that eventually reached 94 possibilities. By May 25, with Richard Nixon and Barry Goldwater clamoring for bombing of the north, LBJ had made the decision that the U.S. would directly attack North Vietnam at an unspecified point in the future. But it is important to note that even before the Tonkin Gulf incident, Johnson had ordered the drawing up of a congressional resolution. This had been finalized by William Bundy, McGeorge Bundy's brother.

 

"Who is Ted Bundy?"

Miles W. Mathis

http://mileswmathis.com/bundy.pdf

Anonymous ID: f36806 Feb. 16, 2019, 12:05 p.m. No.5208955   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Maybe the bug eye look of all the Dem creeps is on purpose, they are instructed to do that so they will look crazy?

"Tedwas probably instructed to open his eyes wide, to make him look crazy. They gave the same directionto Manson five years earlier. "

 

http://mileswmathis.com/bundy.pdf