Anonymous ID: 85e863 Jan. 14, 2018, 5:05 p.m. No.52407   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2447

>>52388

A sensationalist for sure, but she did do PV work and is in with JO'. I have the feeling she is right. And he was already asked to step away. I read it three days ago, but can't find it now. Business Insider or Bloomberg.

Anonymous ID: 85e863 Jan. 14, 2018, 5:42 p.m. No.52716   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>52671

Maybe. Those guys have pretty much gone to the ops thread at this point. Very few images in this thread. Seems like a chat room. lol. But those disc guys running that YT are branching out. They have a guest speaker… up to 1400 viewers. They aren't going over the posts right now.

You guys dog on him being a famefag, but this is an example to me of a splintering out of a mooovement.

Anonymous ID: 85e863 Jan. 14, 2018, 5:54 p.m. No.52828   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2879

>>52765

Just surprised. And I am. Thee are many splinter groups that are using his board. It is ok. He answers in here, so he has a home base, but there are a lot of lookers. That YT keeps a lot of the nonautist where they are better off.

This board has changed significantly since our original founding. Sometimes it's good and sometimes, it's quite… not. We are moving down the field though, and literally have marching orders. A LOT of them.

Anonymous ID: 85e863 Jan. 14, 2018, 6:07 p.m. No.52973   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>52924

he is a former Journo with a real story. That said, he is fact based most of the time. He is crabby, yes. But he is one of those very logical-rational guys. Therefor he has limitations. And his take on anything done here would be done with that kind of mind. Some is good, some is bad. I still read him, rex and others to watch their perspectives as a whole. Then I go read crazy dems and Obummer was right, we are on a different planet. What he omitted was it is the right one.