>>52077

He followed in the footsteps of the topical meaning of his last name. He betrayed his own brother, his own family, his own country.

The reason we don't say his name has nothing to do with the bible. I just found it convenient that his last name has a connection to this story... A story of betrayal, of people who you expect to trust and who turn around and prove otherwise.

>>52282

OH. ok. I think this is the first time I heard of No name referring to Bush. strange. This whole time I thought it was John M.

either way both call themselves Republican and both went to bed with the liberal agenda.