The real reason for Bezos divorce.

Keep a close eye on Jeff Bezos in the near. I have a theory about his recent divorce. As many of you may know, the economy will be having a major correction soon. Stocks could easily go down 50% or more. Bezos, being close with the CIA and the richest man in the world, probably knows this. He knows that he will lose tens of billions of dollars. So what does he want to do?

Sell as much Amazon stock as possible. Because his entire net worth is in Amazon stock. But imagine if Bezos suddenly started offloading billions in Amazon shares? The stock price would crash. The entire market could crash from something that big. He could also get charged with securities fraud if he sells because he knows something will go down soon.

So what is old Jeff to do?

Follow the lead of the only executive to get away scot free after Enron collapsed. When Enron was about to collapse, all the executives sold millions of dollars of their shares. They ended up getting charged for this fraud. Except for one man. He just so happened to divorce his wife for some random stripper. Right before the collapse. A judge ordered him to sell his shares and split the proceeds with his now ex wife. So he was able to get away will it all.

My theory is that Bezos know that the stock market will soon collapse. He wants to have a way to sell off his shares without getting in trouble or alerting the public that something is wrong. So he orchestrates some high profile affair and his wife leaving him. He makes sure there is a ton of drama to keep it in the news. Then during the divorce proceedings, he is "ordered" to sell his stock. So nobody thinks twice.

It turns out that the person who leaked the affair story to the press was none other than the brother of the mistress. He also just happened to come out an publicly say that Bezos and his wife are't telling the truth about the divorce and that they have other reasons.

So keep an eye out on this. When he starts to offload his Amazon shares, you know the collapse is imminent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lou_Pai

Trump declares national emergency. Time to repost this. Read carefully.

1/2

Please allow me to frame the issues involved with "the wall" in its actual terms. Despite what the media is saying, this is not about Democrat vs. Republican. In short, the executive branch of our government is threatening to declare a national emergency since the legislative branch will not authorize the seizure of private American property for a federal works project nor will fund it. The executive branch has already shut down the federal government. It is currently threatening to extend this government shut down for however long it takes for the legislative branch to cave.

Let us break this down.

First of all, the framework of our government is based on checks and balances. Power is divided into three branches: the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial. The Legislative branch controls the purse strings of government and creates laws. The Executive branch carries out those laws. The Judicial branch tells us whether the laws are constitutional or not. Each branch was designed to be able to balance the other branches.

Why? As shown by our original rebellion, Americans didn't want a King or a Dictator when we were setting up our government. We were not particularly thrilled with a House of Lords telling us what we could or could not do either.

In this case, the executive branch wants to: (1) take governmental cash, (2) create its own law, (3) take away private property from American citizens (4) create its own federal works project.

At least three of these functions fall within the power/ responsibility of the legislative branch. So, what is the problem? This is one of the most naked power grabs by the executive branch over the others in recent history. Once that power is exercised, it is going to be difficult or impossible to regain any balance again. The executive branch was never meant to have that much power (see our country's previous concerns about Kings and Dictators). Is this constitutional? Very doubtful. Should all Americans be concerned? That is a question for you to answer yourself.

Second, a "National Emergency" is generally declared under these general conditions: (1) Natural disasters including hurricanes, tornados, and earthquakes to name a few. (2) Public health emergencies such as significant outbreaks of infectious diseases. (3) Military attacks. (4) Civil insurrection. (5) Any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy.

Now the first 4 aren't applicable. The last category was meant to be short-term only. It was designed to be reviewed by the legislative branch every year after it’s enacted (because again; the check and balance is fundamental to how we operate).

This part is important: So, what is the problem here? If national emergencies can be declared by the executive branch for non-emergency purposes which vest power in one branch of the government why would that branch ever let go of that power again?

Third, the seizure of private property (known as “eminent domain”, a body of law which says the government cannot just take your home without due process). You are joking, right? No. The US/Mexican border is 1,933 miles long. It runs through 4 states (California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas). Only 33% of that land is actually owned or managed by the Federal Government. A sizable percentage of that land is owned by the Indian nations. It is land preserved for those tribes by treaty and land given under treaty is not land owned by the United States. These tribes already have a lot of reasons to be angry at the Federal Government. This would be pouring additional gas on an open flame.

The other 64% of that land is privately owned.

How much land would have to be taken? The amount of land that the Federal Government would have to take would likely run 1,237 miles long to 12,371 miles deep (assuming a 1 to 10-mile DMZ from the border into the United States). Even if we could only take 100 to 500 ft of land in densely populated areas, that is a lot of private property that is going to be seized by the Federal government.

The land necessary for this project would also run through some highly populated areas in the US such as San Diego, Calexico, Nogales, El Paso, and Laredo. There will be a lot of Americans who are going to have their homes and businesses taken by the federal government. Which will also mean a lot of lawsuits.

>>5210210

Trump declares national emergency. Time to repost this. Read carefully.

2/2

In terms of the federal works project, these types of works include hospitals, bridges, highways, walls and dams. These projects may be funded by local, state, or federal appropriations. If they are federal, they are funded by the legislative branch of our government (the same branch that our executive branch is currently trying to take power from). Is the seizure of power constitutional? Not likely given the separation of powers discussed above.

Finally, these considerations do not take into account the sheer cost, human and monetary, that will be involved. The Department of Homeland Security estimates the current cost at $21 billion for construction alone (not counting costs of maintenance or costs associated with increased military/federal patrolling).

Ask yourself a simple question. When was the last time that you saw a governmental project brought in under time and under budget? Does anyone remember the “big dig” in Boston, Mass? The actual costs are likely to be much higher. This estimated cost also does not include compensating folks for taking their land or the associated impact upon their businesses.

The Federal budget deficit grew to $779 billion dollars in 2018 according to the Treasury Department. How are we, as a country, going to fund this project? How are we, as a country, going to deal with the additional debt? Unlike private businesses, our country cannot declare bankruptcy.

This is not about Democrat vs. Republican. It is not about who has the best zingers measured in 10 second sound bites. It is about our country. The core of this issue deals with the profound and immense changes the outcome will have on the structure of our nation. This is the way that we, as a country, should be framing these issues. Please think about it.

What a coincidence that the comet ping pong shooter and arsonist both were actors.

https://m.imdb.com/name/nm7831483/

Why did they(whoever they) give us internet?

Internet is good tool to control us, look at all the SNS, bots, propaganda, ads, manipulating schemes, distractions.

BUT also, thx to internet we're more aware of everything. Many things are being exposed, ruling class can't hide anymore, people are always learning more knowledge, also we're communicating.

Internet is gamble for each side. Someone who rules the internet can win.

But the downside for each other is, internet is too large to control. That's why many uncivilized countries block the internet, and dictatorship countries like China block the outside internet community.

I think it would've been easier to control us without internet at all. Old media was so easy to manipulate. If there was some massacre in a far away country, in old days no one knew about it unless some sacrificing reporter risked his life during taking the photos. But nowadays everyone knows about everything through SNS.

It's much easier to control us without internet. Manipulation scheme has its limits, no internet is better for total control.

So, why did they give us internet? Was it accident? Does this mean that Ruling Class aren't that strong nor smart?

People always say internet is controlling tool and distraction, but guys, internet freed us from many things.

MK Ultra evolved to fit the modern day; brain washing is now done online en masse

Seems fairly obvious, once you learn the basic mechanics of how the human mind works you can control vast quantities of people without their conscious awareness if you have have access to the media they consume on a day to day basis.

I'm of the belief we're being distracted from the real picture and that this media outrage over the dumbest shit, whether it be that kid smirking, or the most recent headlines [pardon me I don't watch TV] it's all a front.

There is purposeful dumbing down of youth, elsa gate etc. "entertainment" is mindless.

We like to imagine we would be able to tell if we were being controlled, but im sorry to say your thoughts are not your own, memes are contagious.

"they" know this. The elite herd us like sheep, keeping us from learning the truth about reality. Keep slaving away. work. produce. conform.

we are predictable and easily corralled, and the illusion that we aren't is what is keeping us trapped.

Here's my low effort sleep deprived post. I have good intentions but lack the mental energy, I hope my point is considered despite my lack of elegance.

NYC: More Black Babies Killed by Abortion Than Born

In 2012, there were more black babies killed by abortion (31,328) in New York City than were born there (24,758), and the black children killed comprised 42.4% of the total number of abortions in the Big Apple, according to a report by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/nyc-more-black-babies-killed-abortion-born

>>5210694

NOTABLE