>>520670 (last bread)

<Trying to apply markers in ridiculous ways to point to random anon posts in the bread and convince everyone it's a secret Q poster is a common example of this

This is a shill talking point that attempts to limit the Q team's communication.

Your claim of "random anons" can only be true if the POTUS tweet deltas are random and not planned, which Q has repeatedly proven to be false. Thus your claim of "random anons" is false.

POTUS Tweet deltas are backward looking. If POTUS tweets at 0702 and then again at 0722, that is a 20 minute delta, which means 20 minutes is subtracted from the 0702 time to get 0642 marker. What was posted at 0602? Does it have any bearing on current tasks? Does it provide useful information? Does it correlate to language in the POTUS tweets?

In this situation, the first tweet is 20 minutes after the marker and the second tweet establishing the marker is 40 minutes after the marker. Is the connection between the two POTUS tweets, the delta and the marker established by the delta a coincidence? It is if the POTUS tweets are random.

POTUS Tweets and DELTA

Q specifically mentioned the 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15 minute deltas. Expanding that just a bit you get deltas that are divisible by 5. Thus, these markers are to be looked at for something, whether it be the words and phrases in the POTUS tweets, the spaces or gaps, or perhaps posts on this board. Because such markers are not random.

If the POTUS tweet deltas of 0, 1 and divisible by 5 are not random, then they knowingly point to something the anons are supposed to look at, because the deltas refer to a past time marker. It may be something that isn't for us because Q communicates with others as well, but the anons should be looking at the posts, the words POTUS uses, the spaces, the missing letters, the misspellings, everything associated with these markers. Why?

The Future Proves The Past

Future tweets provide a marker that proves a past point in time. That past point in time is specifically chosen by the timing of both the first and second tweets.

Who are you to say that the markers are not to apply to posts on this board? Q said they would guide us. A reasonable interpretation of that is they'll point in the right direction when the anons get something correct or relevant in order to guide us.

This comms system leaves all other POTUS tweet deltas free. They may or may not point to something on this board because they provide the noise that hides the comms. They may point to totally random things because the deltas don't fall into the specific group of deltas that do provide us with markers. They provide the forest the specific trees are hiding in.

The people who argue against this simple logic are trying to limit the ability of the anons to understand the communication that is happening.