Anonymous ID: 1f5f56 Feb. 16, 2019, 9:48 p.m. No.5217756   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7764 >>7773 >>7782 >>7820 >>7896 >>7901 >>7972 >>8022 >>8029 >>8154 >>8174 >>8297 >>8350 >>8397 >>8448 >>8458 >>8481 >>8524 >>8542

Former top FBI lawyer: 2 Trump cabinet officials were ‘ready to support’ 25th Amendment effort

 

Former top FBI lawyer James Baker, in closed-door testimony to Congress, detailed alleged discussions among senior officials at the Justice Department about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office, claiming he was told Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said two Trump Cabinet officials were “ready to support” such an effort.

 

During his testimony, Baker acknowledged he was not directly involved in the May 2017 discussions but testified over a two-day period in October that McCabe and Page came to him contemporaneously after meeting with Rosenstein for input in the days after Comey was fired by the president.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-top-fbi-lawyer-2-trump-cabinet-officials-were-ready-to-support-25th-amendment-effort

 

DIG ANONS!!!!!

TWO CABINET MEMBERS IN ~ MAY OF 2017 WE FUCKING TRAITORS

Anonymous ID: 1f5f56 Feb. 16, 2019, 9:55 p.m. No.5217861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7976

>>5217817

>>5217788

>>5217773

>>5217764

>>5217782

>>5217796

>>5217799

But when the New York Times broke the story in September, it reported that Rosenstein told McCabe he might be able to persuade then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and then-Secretary of Homeland Security and later White House chief of staff John Kelly to invoke the 25th Amendment.

 

But this now says they HAD THEM READY, so I doubt they're the same people

 

“I was being told by some combination of Andy McCabe and Lisa Page, that, in a conversation with the Deputy Attorney General, he had stated that he – this was what was related to me – that he had at least two members of the president’s Cabinet who were ready to support, I guess you would call it, an action under the 25th Amendment,” Baker told the committees.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/former-top-fbi-lawyer-2-trump-cabinet-officials-were-ready-to-support-25th-amendment-effort

Anonymous ID: 1f5f56 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:15 p.m. No.5218139   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8156 >>8301 >>8366 >>8458 >>8481

THIS IS THE ARTICLE FIRST WRITTEN BY THE NYT ABOUT THIS THAT IS MENTIONED IN THE FOX NEWS ARTICLE

THE FOX NEWS ARTICLE IS ONLY AN HOUR OLD

 

Rod Rosenstein Suggested Secretly Recording Trump and Discussed 25th Amendment

 

https://archive.fo/20190114173856/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/21/us/politics/rod-rosenstein-wear-wire-25th-amendment.html

 

RR, A GREY HAT, WAS THEIR FALL GUY

>If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.

>if Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.

>Not confirming SC is on /team/.

>Question everything.

>Timing important.

>Planned?

>Confused?

>SC targeting who?

>SC on team?

>SC off team?

>Questions reveal answers.

>Time will tell.

>Why did Mueller meet POTUS 1-day prior to FBI announcement if Mueller COULD NOT be offered director due to prev term limits rule?

Anonymous ID: 1f5f56 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:23 p.m. No.5218240   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8271 >>8301 >>8458 >>8481

>>5218156

>Yeah, a "grey hat" because the NYT says so.

wow, lurk moar

>>5218174

RR was SARCASTICALLY saying "Well, what do you want me to do, Andy, wear a wire?"

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/rosenstein-joked-about-secretly-recording-trump-say-sources-n911981

 

he was basically saying: wtf are you retarded? how would we even fucking do this? wear a fucking wire? are you retarded? WHO THE FUCK WOULD I ASK? SESSIONS? HE LOVES POTUS. KELLY? HE WOULD DIE FOR POTUS.

 

it was angrily sarcastic, not literal at all

BUT THERE WERE TWO LEGITIMATE CABINET OFFICIALS THEY HAD, not Sessions or Kelly

Anonymous ID: 1f5f56 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:29 p.m. No.5218337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8351

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

>Information waterfall.

Anonymous ID: 1f5f56 Feb. 16, 2019, 10:34 p.m. No.5218409   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5218379

the NYT is different from what Q posted

Q posted the FOX article, which references the NYT

and only if you want Baker, many anons agree with the Grey Hat theory