>>5218467 (lb)
What would be the point if any POTUS could retire at will any prior national emergency? Unless Trump is trying to void the practice once and for all?
>>5218467 (lb)
What would be the point if any POTUS could retire at will any prior national emergency? Unless Trump is trying to void the practice once and for all?
Why are you stuck on this material? You're way behind doing your genius decodes on Q's other posts.
What's worse, Bible literalists or Sumerian literalists? Or are they both equally tiresome?