IPFS needs to hurry up and make anonymity a priority.
Then we need actual fast internet for both uploads and downloads, and we can individually host our own content, or at least provide some confirmation.
JK = Kushner?
How can you tell a company what to do with it's content without violating all kinds of legal shit.
Why not fight to lower the cost of infrastructure and ask for some analysis to be done that leads to lease-able last mile infrastructure?
We specifically need 1st amendment rights applied to Serialized Data Structures (Which would allow bits to be considered protected speech) which would give programmers some legal standing that their software can't be censored outright. It would also give the user protections in that whichever platform is being used the data they intend to send is also protected speech and cannot be censored outright. We could then argue that companies like twitter who's sole purpose is to display and congregate "tweets" must do so equally, they are free to remove things that are not protected speech (terroristic threats, illegal content, etc).
But this is just a potential legislative fix. Ultimately we need secure and auditable software, hardware, and standards, a darknet will still probably flourish.
Just a thought. What I want seems like a pipe dream, too good to be true.