>>522013

I'm not in favor of an Internet Bill of Rights. The original Bill of Rights is sufficient, in my view.

That aside, I'm not sure Q is in favor of an Internet Bill of Rights, either. Consider this post in which he mentions it:

Thank you F&F!

Coincidence?

AT&T>No Such Agency [contract].

AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH.

Internet Bill of Rights.

Q

Here, Q is saying that AT&T became (>) the NSA. AT&T also became Google, Facebook, etc.

The problem is, NSA, Google, Facebook, etc., all became the "enemy" in various different ways.

While all of us want to "prevent unfair censorship" (Q's words), I believe Q is telling us the Internet Bill of Rights is the opposite of the best way to go about it.

>>522176

Right. Point being meme-ing in favor of the Internet Bill of Rights is not our mission here. It is not what Q wants us to do.

Q wants us to develop the map by PROVING it.

>>522147

Let's focus on PROVING the map.