Beink cap't obvious hopium here, but couldn't the people argue that POTUS's first two years were so impeded due to the coup attempt and it's subsequent consequences; he and the voters are entitled to those two years back?
Beink cap't obvious hopium here, but couldn't the people argue that POTUS's first two years were so impeded due to the coup attempt and it's subsequent consequences; he and the voters are entitled to those two years back?