Anonymous ID: c1fb21 Feb. 17, 2019, 10:34 a.m. No.5225040   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Suit: Washington AG Colluded with Unions

 

Think tank says Trump opponent redacted emails to cover up coziness with labor groups

 

Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson tried to cover up his office's collusion with labor unions after a think tank asked for public records about their communications, according to a lawsuit. Ferguson is one of several Democrats seeking to resist the Trump administration's directive that would prohibit states from siphoning Medicaid payments away from at-home caregivers and putting them in the pockets of labor unions, such as Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). The Freedom Foundation, a Washington state pro-free market think tank, requested public records about the attorney general's communications with major public sector unions relating to the policy. In return, it received pages of emails from Ferguson's office. The bodies of those messages were reduced to black ink, nearly everything redacted except for the salutations and signatures of the senders. Now the foundation is suing for the full records, saying that the government is covering up its collusion with powerful labor organizations. "Defendant Bob Ferguson and his Office are illegally ignoring the [Public Records Act] to hide a political relationship between two powerful special interest groups," the lawsuit obtained by the Washington Free Beacon says. "This Court should order the records to be disclosed immediately." Ferguson's press office did not respond to requests for comment about the public records request or the nature of his relationship with unions.

 

In July, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued new rules that would prevent state governments from requiring home health aides, many of whom are caring for relatives, to pay a portion of their Medicaid reimbursements to labor organizations. Labor unions receive at least $71 million each year from such payments even after the Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that such a forced dues scheme in Illinois violated the Constitution. "The law provides that Medicaid providers must be paid directly and cannot have part of their payments diverted to third parties outside of a few very specific exceptions," Acting Director Tim Hill said in a release announcing the rule. "This proposed rule is intended to ensure that providers receive their complete payment, and any circumstances in which a state does divert part of a provider’s payment must be clearly allowed under the law."

 

Ferguson's office has been one of the most ambitious in filing lawsuits against the Trump administration, leading the high-profile lawsuit against the executive order restricting travel from seven majority-Muslim nations. Maxford Nelsen, a labor policy expert at the Freedom Foundation, said the attorney general's actions in this case are centered on advancing the interests of his political allies, rather than any concern for taxpayers or home health aides. "The Washington Attorney General will be using tax dollars to try and avoid having to disclose documents showing how his office is using tax dollars to protect unions' ability to seize tax dollars from Medicaid," Nelsen said. "The whole situation is exhibit A of the collusion taking place between Left Coast state governments and the unions they rely on for political support. The losers in this relationship are taxpayers and, in this case, home caregivers." The think tank is now seeking damages if the state continues to bury the documents. The lawsuit asks the court to force the state to pay $100 each day for every page that it withholds from public view.

 

https://freebeacon.com/issues/suit-washington-ag-colluded-with-unions/

 

Emails about the West Coast Litigation Effort

https://www.freedomfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/WA-AGO-emails-about-West-Coast-litigation-effort.pdf

Anonymous ID: c1fb21 Feb. 17, 2019, 10:47 a.m. No.5225346   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Report: Widespread National Food Stamp Fraud Totals at Least $1 Billion, Could Be as High as $4.7 Billion

 

According to a new report produced by the Government and Accountability Office (GAO), at least $1 billion in food stamp benefits are "trafficked annually," meaning they are fraudulently used. The extent of the fraud is uncertain, the GAO warns, estimating the abuse of the program could be as high as $4.7 billion. About 20 million lower-income households receive benefits from the $64 billion Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps, to buy food. But GAO found that instead of being used for food, many stores are defrauding the program by "selling" cash instead of food. "For example, a store might give a person $50 in exchange for $100 in benefits – then pocket the difference," GAO explains. The Food Nutrition Service (FNS) within the U.S. Department of Agriculture oversees SNAP and is responsible for authorizing and overseeing retailers. The fraud, known as "retailer trafficking,"costs taxpayers at least $1 billion. However, the real cost could be "anywhere from $960 million to $4.7 billion," the GAO adds.

 

The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank advocating reform, launched a "Stop the Scam initiative" to raise awareness of the widespread problem. "Welfare fraud is one of the biggest untold stories of the last decade, robbing resources from the truly needy and eroding public trust in the integrity of our welfare programs," Sam Adolphsen, vice president of executive affairs at FGA, said in a statement. "While the bad-actor food stamp retailers exposed in this GAO report are in part to blame, we must not lose sight of the accountability that falls upon the food stamp recipient willing to commit fraud and abuse the system." The FGA hopes to reduce fraud and abuse at the state level by uncovering discrepancies in each state’s eligibility systems by regularly reviewing their processes. "Too few states take these crimes seriously, and both states and the federal government can do more on this front," FGA maintains.

 

The GAO published five recommendations for FNS to follow in order to crack down on SNAP fraud. They include FNS adding retailer trafficking estimates in future reports, which it has not done. Likewise, FNS should readdress the factors it uses to identify stores for possible investigation, and evaluate the "accuracy of its assumption of the percentage of SNAP benefits that are trafficked by different types of stores," the GAO states. Although FNS assigns a risk level to each store when it applies to participate in SNAP, it is not currently using this information to target its reauthorization activities to stores of greatest risk. "FNS currently reauthorizes all stores on the same 5-year cycle, regardless of risk, although its policy states that it will reauthorize certain high-risk stores annually," GAO states. FNS officials said they planned to reauthorize a sample of high-risk stores each year but they never did. Officials also stated that they did not document an analysis of the benefits and costs of this practice, "which would be consistent with leading fraud risk management practices," GAO states. As a result, FNS does not have any practices in place to detect early oversight of stores to prevent fraud. Finally, GAO recommended that FNS should "determine the appropriate scope and time frames for reauthorizing high-risk stores," increase penalties for retail traffickers, and establish performance measures for its trafficking prevention activities. The Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 gave the USDA the authority to strengthen penalties for retailers that commit fraud, but as of November 2018, FNS had not done so. "By failing to take timely action to strengthen penalties, FNS has not taken full advantage of an important tool for deterring trafficking," GAO states. When the GAO confirms what actions FNS has taken in response to its recommendations, it plans to provide updated information to the public, the agency states. It states that the FNS generally agreed with its findings. The USDA/FNS did not respond to requests to comment for this story.

 

https://freebeacon.com/issues/report-widespread-national-food-stamp-fraud-totals-at-least-1-billion-could-be-as-high-as-4-7-billion/